NanoMagnet Logic: An Architectural Level Overview - Field-Coupled Nanocomputing: Paradigms, Progress, and Perspectives - page 251

We will therefore continue to investigate NML (and QCA) architectures fol-
lowing these guidelines, always keeping an eye at the technological constraints
in order to get the most realistic results.
References
1. Lent, C., Tougaw, P., Porod, W., Bernstein, G.: Quantum cellular automata. Nan-
otechnology 4 , 49-57 (1993)
2. Csurgay, A., Porod, W., Lent, C.: Signal processing with near-neighborcoupled
time-varying quantum-dot arrays. IEEE Trans. Circ. Syst. 47 (8), 1212-1223 (2000)
3. Lu, U., Lent, C.: Theoretical study of molecular quantum-dot cellular automata.
J. Comput. Electron. (Springer) 4 , 115-118 (2005)
4. Imre, A., Ji, L., Csaba, G., Orlov, A.O., Bernstein, G., Porod, W.: Magnetic logic
devices based on field-coupled nanomagnets. In: 2005 International Semiconductor
Device Research Symposium, p. 25, December 2005
5. Pulimeno, A., Graziano, M., Abrardi, C., Demarchi, D., Piccinini, G.: A write-
in system based on electric fields for molecular QCA. In: 2011 IEEE International
NanoElectronics Conference (INEC), Tao-Yuan, Taiwan, pp. 1-2. IEEE, June 2011
6. Pulimeno, A., Graziano, M., Piccinini, G.: Molecule interaction for QCA compu-
tation. In: IEEE International Conference on Nanotechnology, pp. 1-5 (2012)
7. Pulimeno, A., Graziano, M., Demarchi, D., Piccinini, G.: Towards a molecular
QCA wire: simulation of write-in and read-out systems. Solid State Electron. 77 ,
101-107 (2012)
8. Pulimeno, A., Graziano, M., Saginario, A., Cauda, V., Demarchi, D., Piccinini, G.:
Bis-ferrocene molecular QCA wire: ab-initio simulations of fabrication driven fault
tolerance. IEEE Trans. Nanotechnol. 12 (4), 498-507 (2013)
9. Lent, C., Isaksen, B.: Clocked molecular quantum-dot cellular automata. IEEE
Trans. Electron devices 50 (9), 1890-1896 (2003)
10. Porod, W.: Magnetic logic devices based on field-coupled nanomagnets. Nano &
Giga (2007)
11. Pulimeno, A., Graziano, M., Piccinini, G.: UDSM trends comparison: from technol-
ogy roadmap to UltraSparc Niagara2. IEEE Trans. VLSI Syst. 20 (7), 1341-1346
(2012)
12. Niemier, M., Hu, X., Alam, M., Bernstein, G., Porod, W., Putney, M., DeAngelis,
J.: Clocking structures and power analysis for nanomagnet-based logic devices. In:
International Symposium on Low Power Electronics and Design, Portland-Oregon,
USA, pp. 26-31. IEEE (2007)
13. Niemier, M., et al.: Nanomagnet logic: progress toward system-level integration.
J. Phys. Condens. Matter 23 , 34 (2011)
14. Csaba, G., Porod, W.: Behavior of nanomagnet logic in the presence of thermal
noise. In: International Workshop on Computational Electronics, Pisa, Italy, pp.
1-4. IEEE (2010)
15. Graziano, M., Chiolerio, A., Zamboni, M.: A Technology Aware Magnetic QCA
NCL-HDL Architecture, Italy, Genova, pp. 763-766. IEEE (2009)
16. Chiolerio, A., Allia, P., Graziano, M.: Magnetic dipolar coupling and collective
effects for binary information codification in cost-effective logic devices. J. Magn.
Magn. Mater. 324 (19), 3006-3012 (2012)