THE TIME EVOLUTION OF THE HARD AND SOFT ACIDS AND BASES THEORY - Theoretical and Computational Research in the 21st Century - page 54

7. (a) Lowry, T. M.; The uniqueness of hydrogen . Chem. Ind . 1923, 42, 43-47.
(b) Brønsted, J. N.; The acid-basic function of molecules and its dependency
on the electric charge type. J. Phys. Chem. 1926, 30, 777-790.
8. (a) Lewis,G. N.; The atom and the molecule. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1916, 38,
762-785.
(b) Lewis, G. N.; Valence and the Structure of Atoms and Molecules. New
York: Chemical Catalogue Co.; 1923 .
9. (a) Pearson, R. G.; Hard and soft acids and bases. J. Am. Chem. Soc . 1963, 85,
3533-3539.
(b) Pearson, R. G.; Acids and bases. Sci . 1966, 151, 172-177.
10. Hohenberg, P.; and Kohn, H.; Inhomogeneous electron gas. Phys Rev . 1964,
136, 864-871.
11. Parr, R. G.; and Yang, W.; Density Functional Theory of Atoms and Mol-
ecules. Oxford University Press, USA; 1989 .
12. Pearson, R. G.; Hard and soft acids and bases—the evolution of a chemical
concept. Coord. Chem. Rev . 1990, 100, 403-425.
13. Sidgwick, N. V.; Complex formation. J. Chem. Soc . 1941, 433-443.
14. Bjerrum, J.; On the tendency of the metal ions toward complex formation.
Chem. Rev . 1950, 46, 381-401.
15. Davies, J. A.; Synthetic Coordination Chemistry: Principles and Practice.
World Scientific, Singapore; 1996 .
16. Gispert, J. R.; Coordination Chemistry. Wiley-VCH; 2008 . www.beck.de
doi: 10.1002/aoc.1550
17. Irving, H. M. N. H.; and Williams, R. J. P.; The stability of transition-metal
complexes. J. Chem. Soc. 1953, 3192-3210.
18. Jahn, H. A.; and Teller, E.; Stability of polyatomic molecules in degenerate
electronic states. I. orbital degeneracy. Proc. R. Soc. London A . 1937, 161,
220-235.
19. (a) Ahrland, S.; Chatt, J.; and Davies, N. R.; The relative affinities of ligand
atoms foracceptor molecules and ions. Q. Reu. Chem. Sot . 1958, 12, 265-276.
(b) Chatt, J.; The stabilisation of low valent states of the transition metals:
introductory lecture. J. Inorg. Nucl. Chem . 1958, 8, 515-531.
(c) Ahrland, S.; Factors contributing to (b) behavior in acceptors. Struct.
Bonding (Berlin). 1966, 1, 207-210.
20. Edwards, J. O.; and Pearson, R. G.; The factors determining nucleophilic re-
activities. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1962, 84, 16-24.
21. Williams, R. J. P.; and Hale, J. D.; The classification of acceptors and donors
in inorganic reactions. Struct. Bonding (Berlin). 1966, 1, 249-281.
22. Hudson, R. F.; The concept of hard and soft acids and bases and nucleophilic
displacement reactions. Coord Chem. Rev . 1966, 1, 89-94.
23. Jorgenson, C. K.; “Symbiotic” ligands, hard and soft central atoms. Inorg
Chem . 1964, 3, 1201-1202.
24. (a) Klopman, G. A.; Semiempirical treatment of molecular structures. I. Elec-
tronegativity and atomic terms. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1964, 86, 1463-1469.
(b) Klopman, G.; Chemical reactivity and the concept of charge- and frontier-
controlled reactions. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1968, 90, 223-234.