Civil Engineering Reference
In-Depth Information
3. Wiesenthal DA, Hennessy DL (1999) Traf
c congestion, driver stress, and driver aggression,
s.l. Aggressive Behavior 25
4. Novaco RW, Stokols D, Milanesi L (1990) Objective and subjective dimensions of travel
impedance as determinants of commuting stress. s.l. Am J Commun Psychol 18(2):231
-
257
5. Cambridge Systematics, Inc. (1994) Impact of urban congestion on business, repaired for
national cooperative highway research program project 2
17(5). Transportation Research
-
Board, Washington, DC
6. The Cost of Congestion to the Economy of the Portland Region. s.l. (2005) Portland Business
Alliance, Metro, Port of Portland and Oregon Department of Transportation
7. Centre for International Economics (2006) Business costs of traffic congestion. s.l.: Victorian
Competition and Ef
ciency Commission
8. Golob TF, Regan AC (2001) Impacts of highway congestion on freight operations
—
599
9. Weisbrod G, Vary D, Treyz G (2001) NCHRP Report 463: economic implications of
congestion. Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC
10. Minahan T (1969) How buyers changed it. Purchasing Sept 5, 1996
11. European Conference of Ministers of Transport (2007) Managing urban traf
c congestion. s.l.
OECD/ECMT, Paris
12. Produced by Texas Transportation Institute and Cambridge Systematics, Inc. (2006) Travel
time reliability: making it there on time, all the time. s.l. Published by Of
ce of Operations,
Federal Highway Administration, US Department of Transportation, Washington, DC
13. US Department of Transportation, Federal Highway Administration (2006) Freight
performance measurement travel time in freight
perceptions of trucking industry managers. s.l. Transp Res Part A 35(2000):577
-
signicant corridors. Dec. 2006
14. White paper prepared for FHWA by HLB Decision Economics (2001) Creating a freight
sector within HERS. Department
—
of Transportation
(USDOT), Federal Highway
Administration (FHWA), Washington, DC
15. Small Kenneth, Noland Robert, Chu Xuehao, Lewis Divid (1999) NCHRP Report 431:
valuation of travel-time savings and predictability in congested conditions for highway user-
cost estimation. National Academy Press, Washington, DC
16. Guidance on the Average Values of Traveler Time Savings (VTTS). s.l. US Department of
Transportation
17. New York Metropolitan Transportation Council (NYMTC) (2006) Update of the congestion
management process procedures. Nov 16, 2006
18. Federal Highway Administration. The Highway Economic Requirement System (HERS). s.l.
Technical Report, (updated 3/97)
19. Beaton P, Chen C, Meghdir H (1997) Stated choice for transportation demand management
models: a study in predictive validity using a disaggregate truth set. s.l. Transp Res Rec
1598:1
-
8
20. Of
ce of Transportation Policy, US Department of Transportation (2011) Revised
departmental guidance on valuation of travel time in economic analysis
21. Fuel Economy Guide, Model Year 2012 (2012) s.l. US Department of Energy, office of energy
efficiency and renewable energy. US Department of Energy, Washington, DC
22. Schrank D, Lomax T, Eisele B (2011) TTI
'
s 2011 urban mobility report
—
powered by INRIX
traffic data. Texas Transportation Institute,
the Texas A&M University System, College
Station
23. Litman TA, Doherty E (2009) Transportation cost and bene
t analysis: techniques, estimates
and implications, s.l. Victoria Transport Policy Institute, 2 Jan 2009
24. Itrans Consulting Inc. (2006) Cost of non-recurring congestion in Canada-
final report.
Transport Canada Economic Analysis, Ottawa
25. Kononov J, Lyon C, Allery BK (2011) Relating
flow, speed and density of urban freeways to
functional form of a safety performance function. Transp Res Rec 2236 (Safety Data,
Analysis, and Evaluation 2011, 1:11
-
19)
26. TR News, No. 278, January
-
February 2012
27. Grenzeback LR, Woodle CE (1993) The true costs of highway congestion. ITE J
fl
