Chemistry Reference
In-Depth Information
Table 4.2
Parameters of Eq. 4.63 obtained [
90
] by its fitting to numerical
f
(α) data for equation
of random scission
Code
L
c
n
m
L2
2
1.204
1.119
0.4
L3
3
2.080
1.057
0.396
L4
4
2.929
1.039
0.394
L5
5
3.767
1.030
0.391
L6
6
4.597
1.024
0.389
L7
7
5.422
1.020
0.388
L8
8
6.242
1.017
0.386
(4.63)
m
n
f
()
ααα
=
c
(
1
−
) .
Table
4.2
collects the fit parameters of Eq. 4.63.
The aforementioned approach has been tested by using data on the thermal deg-
radation of poly(butylene terephthalate) (PBT), the polymer that degrades via ran-
dom scission. Figure
4.32
presents the
f
(
ʱ
) plots reduced to
ʱ
= 0.5 for experimental
data as well as some theoretical models, including the models of random scission
(L2 and L8) and some solid-state reaction models. Clearly, the random scission
models provide much better fit to the experimental data than any of the solid-state
reaction models that makes a good case for the viability of the derived
f
(
ʱ
) models
of random scission.
Fig. 4.32
Comparison of the
f
(
ʱ
) data for the thermal degradation of PBT (
points
) against theo-
retical models (
lines
). L2 and L8 represent the random scission models with
L
equal to 2 and 8,
respectively. (Reproduced from Sanchez-Jimenez et al. [
90
] with permission of Elsevier)
Search WWH ::
Custom Search