Biophysical Characterisation of Fluvial Corridors at Reach to Network Scales - Fluvial Remote Sensing for Science and Management - page 244

(a) Sacramento 1942-1962

25 160

20

15 120

10

5 80

0

− 5 40

− 10

− 15 0

− 20

− 25 − 40

0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160

Up channel coordinate (km)

(b) Sacramento 1985-2006

25 160

20

15 120

10

5 80

0

− 5 40

− 10

− 15 0

− 20

− 25 − 40

0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160

Up channel coordinate (km)

(c) Strickland1971-2001

60 1000

40 800

20 600

0 400

− 20 200

40 0

−

− 60 − 200

0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350

Up channel coordinate (km)

(d) Strickland1990/1993-2001

80 750

60

40 500

20

0 250

− 20

− 40 0

− 60

− 80 − 250

0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350

Up channel coordinate (km)

Figure 11.5 Lateral migration rates (thin line) and cumulative elongation rates (thick line) below a given up-channel coordinate. For
the Sacramento(a and b), lateral migration rates were computed from air photo pairs according to the methods presented in Lauer
and Parker (2008) and Aalto et al. (2008). For the two Strickland River datasets (c and d), data are identical to those presented in
Aalto et al. (2008).