Environmental Engineering Reference
In-Depth Information
Table 4
RBOB gasoline
parameters
Parameter
Value
kS
m
kþk
99.5614
k þ k
0.5814
c
4.7210
/
0.2329
This leads to the estimation of two additional parameters (Table
4
).
The accuracy of the estimate is substantially improved when seasonality is
included. Whenever there is seasonality its impact should be considered, but in
some cases de-seasonalized series should be worked with. Observe how the esti-
mate of the long-term equilibrium point changes.
4 The Case of ICE EUA Futures
This section gives an example of the calculation of the parameters of a GBM
process using quotes for ICE EUA Futures.
Figure
7
shows the ICE EUA Futures quotations for 08/23/2013. As can be seen,
these prices behave in a way compatible with GBM-type modeling, where:
FðT
1
;
T
2
Þ
¼
S
t
e
ðakÞðT
2
T
1
Þ
ð
14
Þ
given that this model implies exponential growth in the price of the futures contract
as the maturity period increases.
It can clearly be seen in Fig.
7
that the GBM estimate is a better approximation
in this case (it is closer to the actual quotation) than the one provided by an IGBM
model with these data. Using a GBM model has signi
cant implications in terms of
volatility and expected value. Volatility is increasing over time in the risk-neutral
world, which signi
cantly affects the calculation of the value of options:
Var
ðS
T
Þ
¼
S
t
e
2
ðakÞðTtÞ
½e
r
2
ðTtÞ
1
ð
15
Þ
When volatility is high the value of the option increases signi
cantly.
In the real world, it suf
ces to set
k
¼
0, which gives:
e
r
2
ðS
T
Þ
¼
S
t
e
2
aðTtÞ
½
ðTtÞ
Var
1
ð
16
Þ
For cases in which
T
is very close to
t
the expression obtained is
T
¼
t þ
D
t
Var
ðS
tþDt
ÞS
t
r
2
D
t
ð
17
Þ
Search WWH ::
Custom Search