Environmental Engineering Reference
In-Depth Information
Table 4 RBOB gasoline
parameters
Parameter
Value
kS m
kþk
99.5614
k þ k
0.5814
c
4.7210
/
0.2329
This leads to the estimation of two additional parameters (Table 4 ).
The accuracy of the estimate is substantially improved when seasonality is
included. Whenever there is seasonality its impact should be considered, but in
some cases de-seasonalized series should be worked with. Observe how the esti-
mate of the long-term equilibrium point changes.
4 The Case of ICE EUA Futures
This section gives an example of the calculation of the parameters of a GBM
process using quotes for ICE EUA Futures.
Figure 7 shows the ICE EUA Futures quotations for 08/23/2013. As can be seen,
these prices behave in a way compatible with GBM-type modeling, where:
FðT 1 ; T 2 Þ ¼ S t e ðakÞðT 2 T 1 Þ
ð 14 Þ
given that this model implies exponential growth in the price of the futures contract
as the maturity period increases.
It can clearly be seen in Fig. 7 that the GBM estimate is a better approximation
in this case (it is closer to the actual quotation) than the one provided by an IGBM
model with these data. Using a GBM model has signi
cant implications in terms of
volatility and expected value. Volatility is increasing over time in the risk-neutral
world, which signi
cantly affects the calculation of the value of options:
Var ðS T Þ ¼ S t e 2 ðakÞðTtÞ ½e r 2
ðTtÞ
1
ð 15 Þ
When volatility is high the value of the option increases signi
cantly.
In the real world, it suf
ces to set k ¼
0, which gives:
e r 2
ðS T Þ ¼ S t e 2 aðTtÞ ½
ðTtÞ
Var
1
ð 16 Þ
For cases in which T is very close to t the expression obtained is T ¼ t þ D t
Var ðS tþDt ÞS t r 2
D t
ð 17 Þ
Search WWH ::




Custom Search