Environmental Engineering Reference
In-Depth Information
Table 5 Results for wind power
Intercept
2.014
continent_dep_wind_lag5: rdd_res_squared_partsum3_lag2
0.055
continent_dep_wind_partsum4_lag3: rdd_res_squared_partsum1_lag3
0.012
continent_dep_wind_partsum4_lag3: rdd_res_squared_partsum2_lag2
0.068
continent_dep_wind_partsum4_lag3: rdd_res_squared_partsum2_lag3
0.062
continent_dep_wind_partsum5_lag2: rdd_res_squared_partsum2_lag2
0
continent_dep_wind: rdd_wind_partsum5_lag3
0.009
continent_dep_wind: rdd_wind_rooted
0.062
continent_dep_wind: rdd_wind_rooted_lag2
0.188
continent_dep_wind: rdd_wind_rooted_partsum1_lag1
0.012
continent_dep_wind: rdd_wind_rooted_partsum5_lag3
0.199
dep_total_lag5: continent_dep_wind_partsum2_lag1
0.003
dep_total: rdd_wind_partsum2
0.008
dep_wind_dwdist: rdd_wind_dwdist
0.016
dep_wind: dep_wind_dwdistwces
0.069
pat_solar_rooted_lag1
0.36
pat_solar_rooted_partsum1
0.034
pat_total_logged
0.068
0.045
rdd_wind_rooted_lag5 0.015
rdd_wind_rooted_partsum3_lag2 0.002
rdd_wind_rooted_partsum5_lag2 0.346
Note Model chosen from >47,000 variables based on the lowest mean square error in predicting
the n
rdd_res_squared_lag4: continent_dep_wind_partsum4_lag3
'
th observation based on n
1 data. Coef cients rounded at the third decimal digit
Beyond these three main drivers, there are a number of variables with typically
small negative values that are somewhat dif
cult to interpret. We would see them as
correction factors that reduce the aforementioned effects in certain conditions. The
largest is the interaction of RD&D spending on renewables with the deployment of
wind on the continent (continent_dep_wind: rdd_res). One way of interpreting this
is that countries with a lot of non-wind RD&D spending do not bene
t (in terms of
wind patents) as much from the deployment of wind turbines on their continent, as
countries that focus their renewables RD&D on wind (Table 5 ).
The stability of the above-presented results is con
rmed by a plot of the coef-
cients selected by the Lasso for a range of lambdas (Fig. 9 ).
To get some indication of the quality of our results we calculate the share of
variance in the patenting behaviour our model is able to explain (similar to the R 2 ).
The results are displayed in the following table. Given their parsimonious param-
eterisation the
'
goodness-of-
t
'
performance of both models is
impressive
(Table 6 ).
Search WWH ::




Custom Search