Information Technology Reference
In-Depth Information
Lyapunov function and its derivatives, converge uniformly . Control synthesis, how-
ever, requires an affine-in-control structure, as well as some additional artificial vari-
ables which introduce some conservativeness.
Examples will show that polynomial modeling is able to reduce conservativeness
with respect to standard Takagi-Sugeno approaches as the degrees of the polynomials
increase.
5.2 Polynomial Fuzzy Modeling: Taylor Series Approach
This work will consider fuzzy models for a generic n -th order nonlinear dynamic
system with n states and p manipulated inputs so that:
(1) The dynamics of the system can be expressed as:
x
˙
=
f
(
x
,
u
,
z
)
(5.1)
q
is a vector of functions of time (interpretable as exogenous non-manipulated
inputs or actual time-variance).
(2) z takes values in a known compact set
n is the system state, u
p are input variables, and z
where x
(
t
) ∈ R
(
t
) ∈ R
(
t
) ∈ R
z .
(3) ( x
=
0, u
=
0) is an equilibrium point for any value of z , i.e. , f
(
0
,
0
,
z
) =
0for
z .
all z
(4)
fulfill the required Lipschitz conditions for existence and
uniqueness of the solution of ( 5.1 ).
f
(
x
,
u
,
z
)
, u
(
t
)
, z
(
t
)
These above conditions are standard in Takagi-Sugeno fuzzy literature.
Definition 5.1 ( Polynomial fuzzy system ) A polynomial fuzzy system is a system
whose dynamics can be expressed as:
x i
˙
=
p i (
x
,
u
,
z
,μ)
i
=
1
,...,
n
(5.2)
with p i (
x
,
u
,
z
,μ)
being a polynomial in the variables x , u , z and the membership
functions
μ i belonging to the standard simplex:
r
r
1
r
:= { 1 ,...,μ r ) ∈ R
|
0
μ i
1
,
μ i
=
1
}
(5.3)
i
so that p i (
0 (i.e., steady-state equilibrium does not depend on the
membership functions). The meaning of x , u and z is the same as in ( 5.1 ).
0
,
0
,
0
,μ) =
An analogue definition would arise for discrete systems or those with output
equations.
Search WWH ::




Custom Search