Environmental Engineering Reference
In-Depth Information
4.8 Future Research
The conservativeness inherent to the applied linearization, particularly due to the
low-frequency uncertainty, can be eliminated by replacing the LTI design with
the linear parameter varying (LPV) one. At the cost of a bit more complex
implementation, better results particularly in speed regulation can be obtained. The
complexity of the controller can be increased in order to consider more specifi-
cations as attenuating additional oscillation modes by adding more sensing signals.
Acknowledgments The research of F.A. Inthamoussou, H. De Battista, and R.J. Mantz was
supported by Universidad Nacional de La Plata (project 11/I164 2012/15), CONICET (PIP 00361
2012/14), CICpba and ANPCyT (PICT 2012-0037 2013/16) of Argentina. The research of F.D.
Bianchi was supported by the European Regional Development Funds (ERDF, FEDER Programa
Competitivitat de Catalunya 2007-2013).
References
1. Bossanyi EA (2003) Wind turbine control for load reduction. Wind Energy 6(3):229-244
2. Bianchi FD, De Battista H, Mantz RJ (2010) Wind turbine control systems: principles,
modelling and gain scheduling design. Advances in industrial control. Springer-Verlag
London Ltd., London
3. Muhando E, Senjyu T, Uehara A, Funabashi T (2011) Gain-scheduled H
?
control for WECS
via lmi techniques and parametrically dependent feedback part II: controller design and
implementation. IEEE Trans Industr Electron 58(1):57-65
4. Munteanu I, Bratcu A, Cutululis N, Ceang˘ E (2007) Optimal control of wind energy
systems: towards a global approach. Springer-Verlag London Ltd., London
5. Østegaard KZ, Stoustrup J, Brath P (2008) Linear parameter varying control of wind turbines
covering both partial load and full load conditions. Int J Robust Nonlinear Control 19:92-116
6. Jonkman J, Butterfield S, Musial W, Scott G (2009) Definition of a 5-MW reference wind
turbine for offshore system development. Technical report, NREL, 2009
7. Jonkman J (2013) NWTC computer-aided engineering tools (FAST).
http://wind.nrel.gov/
designcodes/simulators/fast/
. Accessed 26 Aug 2013 (Last modified 27 Feb 2013)
8. Lescher F, Jing-Yun Z, Borne P (2006) Switching LPV controllers for a variable speed pitch
regulated wind turbine. J Comput Commun Control 4:73-84
9. Yao X-j, Guo C-C, Li Y (2009) LPV H-infinity controller design for variable-pitch variable-
speed wind turbine. In: Proceedings of the IEEE 6th international power electronics and
motion control conference (IPEMC), pp 2222-2227, 2009
10. Sánchez Peña RS, Sznaier M (1998) Robust systems theory and applications. Wiley, New
York
11. Gahinet P, Apkarian P (1994) A linear matrix inequality approach to H
?
control. Int J Robust
Nonlinear Control 4:421-448
12. Sturm J (1999) Using SeDuMi 1.02, a Matlab toolbox for optimization over symmetric cones.
Optim Methods Softw 11-12:625-653
13. Löfberg J (2004) YALMIP: a toolbox for modeling and optimization in MATLAB. In:
Proceedings of the CACSD conference, Taipei, Taiwan, 2004
14. Turner MC, Postlethwaite I (2004) A new perspective on static and low order anti-windup
synthesis. Int J Control 77(1):27-44
