Environmental Engineering Reference
In-Depth Information
Fig. 14 Intensity I versus
wave vector q measured in
ethanol-in-PAO
nanoemulsion fluids [ 11 ]
5
Ethanol in PAO nanoemulsions
Alcohol/PAO Nanoemulsions
4
3
2
1
0.01
0.1
Wave Vector q(A -1 )
5.1.2 Thermal Conductivity of Ethanol-in-PAO Nanoemulsion Fluids
Figure 15 shows the relative thermal conductivity in Ethanol-in-PAO nano-
emulsion fluids as a function of the ethanol loadings. The observed conductivity
increase in the Ethanol-in-PAO nanoemulsion fluids is rather moderate. The
prediction by the Maxwell model is also plotted in Fig. 15 for comparison. The
relative thermal conductivity is defined as k eff /k o ,wherek o and k eff are thermal
conductivities of the base fluid and nanoemulsion fluids, respectively. The
effective medium theory reduces to Maxwell's equation for suspensions of well-
dispersed, noninteracting spherical particles,
k eff
k o
¼ k p þ 2k o þ 2/ ð k p k o Þ
k p þ 2k o / ð k p k o Þ
ð 7 Þ
where k o if the thermal conductivity of the base fluid, k p is the thermal conductivity
of the particles, and / is the particle volumetric fraction. This equation predicts
that the thermal conductivity enhancement increases approximately linearly with
the particle volumetric fraction for dilute nanofluids or nanoemulsion fluids (e.g.,
/ \ 10 %), if k p [ k o and no change in particle shape. It can be seen in this figure
that the relative thermal conductivity of Ethanol-in-PAO nanoemulsion fluids
appears to be linear with the loading of ethanol nanodroplets over the loading
range from 0 to 9 vol%. However, the magnitude of the conductivity increase is
rather moderate in the ethanol-in-PAO nanoemulsion fluids, e.g., 2.3 % increase
for 9 vol% (k PAO = 0.143 W/mK and k alcohol = 0.171 W/mK [ 35 , 83 ]). No strong
effects of Brownian motion on thermal transport are found experimentally in those
fluids although the nanodroplets are extremely small, around 0.8 nm.
 
Search WWH ::




Custom Search