Environmental Engineering Reference
In-Depth Information
Fig. 15 Digital and SEM images of graphene composite papers containing a MnO
2
nanowires
and b LiFePO
4
particles. c Comparison of galvanostatic charge and discharge curves at different
cycles for the graphene-MnO
2
composite paper and MnO
2
nanowire electrode prepared by
conventional method. d Comparison of galvanostatic charge and discharge curves at different
cycles for the graphene-LiFePO
4
composite paper and LiFePO
4
nanoparticle electrode prepared
by conventional method
Figure
15
c shows the comparison of galvanostatic charge/discharge curves for
the graphene-MnO
2
composite paper and MnO
2
nanowire electrode prepared by
conventional method with CB and PVDF binder. The initial reversible capacities
achieved for the free-standing graphene-MnO
2
composite paper was
531 mAh g
-1
as LIB anode, the capacity is much higher than that of graphene-free
MnO
2
nanowire electrode (320 mAh g
-1
), indicating that the interspaced graph-
ene layers can facilitate electron and Li-ion transport in the electrode. After 10
cycles, the capacity of graphene-MnO
2
reached 548 mAh g
-1
, but the capacity of
graphene-free MnO
2
nanowire electrode rapidly faded to 174 mAh g
-1
. Imply the
effective protection of the MnO
2
nanowires by graphene matrix. Similar to the
results of the graphene-MnO
2
composite paper, graphene-LiFePO
4
composite
paper also shows higher reversible capacity (160 mAh g
-1
) compared with elec-
trode prepared by traditional method (140 mAh g
-1
), when tested as LIB cathode
(Fig.
15
d). The improved performance can also be attributed to the acceleration of
electron transport by graphene matrix. Such method is quite versatile and a wide
range of nanomaterials can be applied to composite with graphene to fabricate
flexible electrode for LIBs. Table
1
compares of the performance of several
Search WWH ::
Custom Search