Environmental Engineering Reference
In-Depth Information
Fig. 23 Theoretical energy
cost for Na (red curve) and Li
(blue curve) ions insertion
into carbon as a function of
carbon interlayer distance
[
58
]
to the different chemical and electrochemical reaction of carbonate solution on the
surface of the hard carbon material [
59
].
It was found that the charge/discharge profiles of the hard carbon anodes
commonly comprise two parts: a slope at the high potential region and a plateau at
the low potential region, as shown in Fig.
21
b[
56
,
59
]. Several spectroscopy
technologies have been used to investigate the specific mechanism, such as ex-situ
or in-situ X-ray diffraction, small-angle X-ray scattering (SAXS), [
55
,
60
,
61
]
23
Na
magic angle spinning nuclear magnetic resonance (MAS NMR) spectra, [
57
] and
Raman spectroscopy [
59
]. By in-situ SAXS investigation, Dahn et al. first dem-
onstrated that the slope at high potential region corresponded to Na intercalation/
deintercalation between the graphene layers and the plateau at the low potential
region corresponded to Na adsorption/desorption in the nanopores of the carbon
particles [
60
].
23
Na MAS NMR spectra corresponding to the hard carbon micro-
spheres also clearly showed that two signal responses during charge and discharge,
which could be ascribed to Na insertion between misaligned graphene carbon
framework and in the nanocavities or on a surface solid film, respectively [
57
]. In
Raman spectroscopy, the shift of the G-band indicates the change of the state of
negatively charged graphenes, the redshift observed during the voltage-sloping
region corresponds to the Na insertion between the graphene layers. No shift of G-
band in lower potential region can be ascribed to the formation of a nano-sized
cluster of quasimetallic Na in the nanopores of the hard carbon [
59
].
It is obvious that the interplanar distances of the graphene layers in hard carbon
will play a vital role on the Na intercalation behavior. Cao et al. carried out a
theoretical simulation on the energy cost for the Na-ion insertion into carbon as a
function of the carbon interlayer distance (Fig.
23
)[
58
]. For comparison, the
energy cost curve for Li-ion insertion into carbon was also calculated (Fig.
23
).
For graphite with an interlayer spacing of 0.335 nm, the energy cost for Li-ion and
Na-ion insertion are 0.03 and 0.12 eV, respectively. In consideration that the
energy of the thermal fluctuations at room temperature is 0.00257 eV, Li-ion
intercalation into graphite layers
is permissible while Na-ion is prohibitive.
Search WWH ::
Custom Search