Best Practices in E-Governance: A Comparative Study Based on the Rutgers University Worldwide Digital Governance Survey - Information and Communication Technologies in Public Administration - page 39

31 Colombia Bogota 39.88 5.93 15.63 7.15 6.40 4.80

32 Kazakhstan Almaty 37.76 5.56 13.76 5.56 6.23 6.67

33 Bolivia La Paz 37.16 2.59 14.07 7.78 9.18 3.54

34 Malaysia Kuala Lumpur 37.09 6.30 14.07 7.46 6.56 2.70

35 Mexico Mexico City 36.98 5.74 12.51 6.19 7.54 5.00

36 Belgium Brussels 36.78 4.45 13.44 12.22 4.59 2.09

37 Portugal Lisbon 36.49 2.96 11.88 7.46 6.07 8.13

38 Italy Rome 35.06 8.89 11.26 7.15 5.90 1.88

39 South Africa Johannesburg 34.03 3.33 11.25 9.21 6.07 4.17

40 Iran (I.R.) Tehran 33.09 7.78 10.32 6.03 6.89 2.09

41 Vietnam Ho Chi Minh 32.95 5.93 11.88 4.76 7.05 3.34

42 Israel Jerusalem 32.83 0.00 12.82 8.89 7.38 3.75

43 Belarus Minsk 32.11 1.11 14.38 6.35 3.61 6.67

44 Argentina Buenos Aires 31.15 1.85 13.75 7.46 4.76 3.33

45 Saudi Arabia Riyadh 30.66 7.78 14.07 5.40 1.97 1.46

46 Australia Sydney 30.52 7.04 13.44 6.99 1.81 1.25

47 Chile Santiago 29.26 1.11 11.25 7.62 8.04 1.25

( Continued )