The Discretionary Space of Geo-Information and Communication Technology Professionals in Public Sector Cooperation Programs - Information and Communication Technologies in Public Administration - page 208

Chisholm, D. (1992). Coordination without hierarchy: Informal structures in multiorganiza-
tional systems . Los Angeles, CA: University of California Press.
Davis, K. C. (1976). Discretionary justice in Europe and America. The Annals of the American
Academy of Political and Social Science , 428 (1), 134.
de By, R. A. (Ed.). (2004). Principles of geographic information systems (3rd ed.). Enschede:
ITC.
de Vries, W. T. (2013). GeoICT uniformity in flexibility. Analysis of the influence of geoICT
coordination on the cooperation between public organisations with geoICT (PhD disserta-
tion). Erasmus University Rotterdam, Enschede.
de Vries, W. T., Crompvoets, J., Stoter, J., & VandenBerghe, I. (2011). Atlas of INSPIRE—
Evaluating SDI development through an inventory of INSPIRE experiences of
European national mapping agencies. International Journal of Spatial Data Infrastructures
Research , 6 (special issue—selected articles from INSPIRE 2010), 126-144.
DiMaggio, P. J., & Powell, W. W. (1983). The iron cage revisited: Institutional isomorphism
and collective rationality in organizational fields. American Sociological Review , 48 (2),
147-160.
Evans, T., & Harris, J. (2004). Street-level bureaucracy, social work and the (exaggerated)
death of discretion. British Journal of Social Work , 34 (6), 871-895.
Finkelstein, S., & Hambrick, D. C. (1990). Top-management-team tenure and organiza-
tional outcomes: The moderating role of managerial discretion. Administrative Science
Quarterly , 35 (3), 484-503.
Hay, C., & Wincott, D. (1998). Structure, agency and historical institutionalism. Political
Studies , XLVI (46), 951-957.
Heeks, R. (2002). Information systems and developing countries: Failure, success, and local
improvisations. The Information Society: An International Journal , 18 (2), 101-112.
Hudson, B. (1989). Michael Lipsky and street-level bureaucracy: A neglected perspective. In
L. Barton (Ed.), Disability and dependency . East Sussex, UK: Psychology Press.
Hupe, P., & Hill, M. (2007). Street-level bureaucracy and public accountability. Public
Administration , 85 (2), 279-299.
Jorna, F. B. A. (2009). De autobureaucratie. Informatisering en leren van uitvoering (Doctor). Leiden.
Retrieved from https://www.openaccess.leidenuniv.nl/handle/1887/13782?mode=more.
Jorna, F., & Wagenaar, P. (2007). The 'iron cage' strengthened? Discretion and digital disci-
pline. Public Administration , 85 (1), 189-214.
Kaniadakis, A. (2012). ERP implementation as a broad socio-economic phenomenon:
The agora of techno-organisational change. Information Technology & People , 25 (3),
259-280.
Lens, V. (2006). Examining the administration of work sanctions on the frontlines of the
welfare system. Social Science Quarterly , 87 (3), 573-590.
Lipsky, M. (1980). Street-level bureaucracy: Dilemmas of the individual in public services . New
York: Russell Sage Foundation.
Lipsky, M. (1983). Street-level bureaucracy: Dilemmas of the individual in public services . New
York: Russell Sage Foundation.
Maynard-Moody, S., & Musheno, M. (2000). State agent or citizen agent: Two narratives
of discretion. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, , 10 (2), 329-358.
Meyer, J. W., & Rowan, B. (1977). Institutionalized organizations: Formal structure as myth
and ceremony. The American Journal of Sociology , 83 (2), 340-363.
Migué, J.-L., Bélanger, G., & Niskanen, W. (1974). Toward a general theory of managerial
discretion. Public Choice, 17 (1), 27-47.