Information Technology Reference
In-Depth Information
Fig. 14.1
Correlation
between two pieces of music
Correleation Stravinsky vs Stenhammar
Z Score
y = -0.2299x + 0.0501
R
2
= 0.0584
R = .2417
Not Significant
1.5
1
0.5
0
-2
-1
0
1
2
-0.5
-1
Stenhammar
-1.5
Stravinsky
Linear
(Stenhammar)
Fig. 14.2
Group scale vs. all
individual average
Individual vs Group
10
9
y = 1.595x -3.523
R² = 0.575
8
7
6
5
4
3
2
Group
Linear (Group)
1
0
0
2
4
6
8
10
Individual
conversations. It is clearly possible for such information to be exchanged as suggested
in Chap. 13. This is a puzzle, so we pose a further question: “
If musical experience is
not being exchanged then what influences the group decision?
” We speculate that the
group discussion is actually performing a different task than exchanging information
about a music experience. Since it is not concerned with any group experience, could
it be concerned with just the exercise of social dominance?
We observed that the discussion proceeds in all seriousness and that there is an
outcome in the form of ally choice that was not previously acknowledged. The actor's
ally preference order seems to relate to the similarity of the order of the evaluation
of music between them. Plotting the distance between two subjects in a relative
four-dimensional (music) z-space can assess this order similarity.
