Information Technology Reference
In-Depth Information
Table 7.2
Initial position of subject A. The table relates the constructs (hypotheses) to the observa-
tions (data) via the probability of observing (say) a triangle if the box contains (say) a cone. Each of
the three constructs is compatible with the only available data, so each datum is assigned an equal
probability of 1.0
Hypothesis:
Observed shape:
2D: triangular card
3D: cone
3D: triangular
section bar
Triangle
p
=
1.0
p
=
1.0
p
=
1.0
Circle
Not envisaged
Not envisaged
Not envisaged
Cross
Not envisaged
Not envisaged
Not envisaged
Table 7.3
Position of subject A after consulting subject B, who reports seeing a circle. There is now
some ambiguity, e.g. if there is a cone in the box, observation of a triangle or a circle are equally
probable
Hypothesis:
observed
shape:
2D: triang.
card
3D: cone
3D: triang. bar
2D: disc
3D: sphere
3D: rod
Triangle
1.0
0.5
1.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
Circle
0.0
0.5
0.0
1
1
1
Cross
Not seen
Not seen
Not seen
Not seen
Not seen
Not seen
Table 7.4
Position of subject A after first consulting subject C who reports seeing a cross
Hypothesis:
observed
shape
2D: triang. card
3D: cone
3D: triang. bar
2D: flat cross
3D: intersecting
sheets
Triangle
1.0
1.0
1.0
0.0
0.0
Cross
0.0
0.0
0.0
1.0
1.0
Circle
Not seen
Not seen
Not seen
Not seen
Not seen
In Gruber's experiments, if a subject interprets a triangular shadow as being
compatible with (say) 'the existence of a solid cone in the box' then this hypothesis
would be ruled out by a second subject's report of a circular image. Consider the
situation of one of three subjects,
A
, as shown in Table
7.2
.
A
has postulated three
objects compatible with the evidence. The observations of subjects
B
and
C
are not
yet known. On the basis of this one observation
A
could postulate a 2-D object (a flat
triangular card) or two 3-D objects (an opaque cone and a triangular bar).
New objects are postulated to explain new kinds of observation. Suppose
A
first
consults
B,
who reports seeing a circle.
A
could postulate or negotiate with
B
the
construction of three further objects (a disc, a sphere, and a rod). A's situation at this
point is shown in Table
7.3
.
Suppose
A
first consults
C,
who reports seeing a cross. Then, as indicated in
Table
7.4
,
A
invokes a different set of hypotheses and phenomena than if
B
is consulted
first.