Databases Reference
In-Depth Information
Taking the derivative of both sides with respect to z , we get
2
2
d
dz
F
(
z
)(
z
z 2 )
2 A 1 (
z
z 2 )(
z
z 1 )
A 1 (
z
z 2 )
=
+
A 2
(98)
z
(
z
z 1 )
2
If we now evaluate the expression at z
=
z 2 , we get
z = z 2
2
d
dz
F
(
z
)(
z
z 2 )
A 2 =
(99)
z
has a root of order m at some z k , that
portion of the partial fraction expansion can be written as
Generalizing this approach, we can show that if D
(
z
)
F
(
z
)
A 1
A 2
A m
=
z k +
2 +···+
(100)
m
z
z
(
z
z k )
(
z
z k )
and the l th coefficient can be obtained as
z = z k
d ( m l )
dz ( m l )
m
(
)(
z k )
1
F
z
z
A l =
(101)
(
) !
m
l
z
Finally, let us drop the requirement that the degree of D
(
z
)
be greater or equal to the degree
of N
(
z
)
. When the degree of N
(
z
)
is greater than the degree of D
(
z
)
, we can simply divide
N
(
z
)
by D
(
z
)
to obtain
N
(
z
)
R
(
z
)
F
(
z
) =
=
Q
(
z
) +
(102)
D
(
z
)
D
(
z
)
where Q
(
z
)
is the quotient and R
(
z
)
is the remainder of the division operation. Clearly, R
(
z
)
will have degree less than D
.
To see how all this works together, consider the following example.
(
z
)
Example12.9.5:
Let us find the inverse Z-transform of the function
2 z 4
+
1
F
(
z
) =
(103)
2 z 3
5 z 2
+
4 z
1
The degree of the numerator is greater than the degree of the denominator, so we divide once
to obtain
5 z 3
4 z 2
+
z
+
1
F
(
z
) =
z
+
(104)
2 z 3
5 z 2
+
4 z
1
The inverse Z-transform of z is
δ n 1 , where
δ n is the discrete delta function defined as
1 n
0
0 otherwise
=
δ n =
(105)
 
Search WWH ::




Custom Search