Nutrient Use and Remineralization - Freshwater Ecology: Concepts and Environmental Applications - page 329

Size Fractionation of Regeneration of Ammonium and Phosphate in the Epilimnion of Pelagic Freshwater Systems a TABLE 16.3

Lake Nutrient High cutoff ( m) Low cutoff ( m) % high % medium % small Reference

Lake Calado (Amazon floodplain) N 20 3 1 39 60 Fisher et al. (1988)

Lake Calado (Amazon floodplain) P 20 3 0 0-45 55-100 Fisher et al. (1988)

Flathead Lake (Montana) N 280 3 0-10 10-25 75-100 Dodds et al. (1991)

Flathead Lake (Montana) P 280 3 0-30 0-45 50-100 Dodds et al. (1991)

Lake Biwa (Japan) N 98 — 50 — 50 Urabe et al. (1995)

Lake Biwa (Japan) P 98 — 15 — 85 Urabe et al. (1995)

Lake Biwa (Japan) N 100 20 3-16 7--18 63-98 Haga et al. (1995)

Lake Kizaki (Japan) N 100 20 1-62 27-68 40-70 Haga et al. (1995)

Ranger Lake (Ontario) P 40 0.8 52 30 18 Hudson and Taylor (1996)

Mouse Lake (Ontario) P 40 0.8 15 65 20 Hudson and Taylor (1996)

Lake Herrensee (Germany) P 150 — 18 — 82 Hantke et al. (1996)

Lake Bräuhaussee (Germany) P 150 — 11 — 89 Hantke et al. (1996)

Lake Thaler See (Germany) P 150 — 2 — 98 Hantke et al. (1996)

a The percentage categories are the percentage regeneration in the size fraction above the high cutoff (% high), between high and low (% medium), and below low (% small).
Where several seasons were studied, ranges are presented for the percentages.