Environmental Engineering Reference
In-Depth Information
200
(a)
(b)
y = 0.0009x 2 - 0.2903x + 32
R 2 = 0.996
1800
y = 0.00011x 2 + 0.0712x-0.7
R 2 = 0.999
1500
150
1200
100
900
600
50
300
0
0
0
200
400
600
800
0
300
600
900
1200
1500
1800
100
100
(c)
(d)
y = -0.0002x 2 + 0.2011x-5.7
R 2 = 0.989
y = 0.0002x 2 + 0.088x-2.5
R 2 = 0.995
75
75
50
50
25
25
0
0
0
100
200
300
400
500
0
100
200
300
400
500
H 2 O 2 production (nM)
Fig. 3 Relationship between H 2 O 2 and HO
in situ produced from river waters and standard
organic substance during the 10 h of irradiation period in photoexperiments conducted using a
solar simulator. The relationships of the ( a , b , c and d ) are the same samples of Fig. 1 . Data
source Mostofa KMG and Sakugawa H (unpublished data)
- is protonated to form HO
At pH < 12 in aqueous solution, O
:
k 3.5
k 3.5
O •− + H 2 O
HO + HO
(3.5)
where k 3.5 = 1.7 × 10 6 M 1 s 1 for the HO
formation reaction and k 3.5 = 1.2 ×
10 10 M 1 s 1 for the reverse reaction. The radical HO
can significantly recombine
and NO 2 ; such reactions are very fast (diffusion-controlled) in aqueous
media (Mack and Bolton 1999 ):
with NO
(3.6)
HO + NO HNO 2
where k 3.6 = 1.0 × 10 6 M 1 s 1 .
HO · + NO 2 NO 2 · + OH
(3.7)
where k 3.7 = 1.0 × 10 10 M 1 s 1 . These reactions can limit the steady-state con-
centration of HO
and, therefore, the ability of the hydroxyl radical to take part in
photooxidation reactions of organic compounds in natural waters. Note, however,
that the main HO
scavengers are DOM in freshwater and bromide in seawater
(Takeda et al. 2004 ).
Search WWH ::




Custom Search