Geography Reference
In-Depth Information
CASE STUDY 5.1 Cladistic Biogeography of Central Chile
Central Chile traditionally has been considered the area located between 30° and
37° south latitude. The analysis of different plant and animal taxa indicates a high
endemism and a close relationship between its austral part and the Subantarctic
subregion. Morrone et al. (1997) carried out a cladistic biogeographic analysis and
a parsimony analysis of endemicity (PAE) in order to provide a natural regionaliz-
ation of the area.
Central Chile was divided into smaller areas of endemism on the basis of dis-
tributional patterns of species of seven genera of the plant family Asteraceae, a
genus of Buprestidae and three genera of Curculionidae (Coleoptera), and two
genera of Gnaphosidae (Araneae). Four areas of endemism were recognized:
Coquimbo (between 30° and 31°5´), Santiago (between 32° and 34°5´), Curicó
(between 35° and 36°), and Ñuble (between 36°2´ and 37°4´). Given its close re-
lationships with the Subantarctic subregion, it was also considered an “external
area” ( fig. 5.8a ) . Ten taxon-area cladograms were obtained for Triptilion , Calo-
pappus-Nassauvia sect. Panargyrum , Leucheria amoena, and L. cerberoana spe-
cies groups (Asteraceae); Mendizabalia (Buprestidae), Listroderes nodifer , and L.
curvipes species groups; and Puranius (Curculionidae), an Apodrassodes , and
Echemoides chilensis species group (Gnaphosidae). Four different methods were
applied: component analysis under assumptions 0, 1, and 2, with options BUILD
and SHARED of Component version 1.5 (Page 1989b); BPA with Hennig86 1.5
(Farris 1988); three area statement analysis with programs TAS (Nelson and
Ladiges 1991b) and Hennig86 1.5 (Farris 1988); and paralogy-free subtree ana-
lysis under assumption 2 with TASS (Nelson and Ladiges 1995) and Hennig86 1.5
(Farris 1988).
Five general area cladograms were obtained. Component analysis under as-
sumptions 0, 1, and 2 produced different sets of resolved area cladograms. The
intersection of all sets did not give a result, but the intersection of some sets under
assumption 1 produced five general area cladograms ( figs. 5.8b - 5.8f ) : 1-3, from
most taxa except Triptilion and the Listroderes curvipes species group; and 4 and
5, from Triptilion, Calopappus, Nassauvia sect. Panargyrum, Leucheria amoena
and L. cerberoana species groups, and Mendizabalia . BPA led to general area
cladograms 4 and 5 (130 steps, consistency index of 0.84, and retention index
of 0.62; figs. 5.8e and 5.8f ). Three area statement analysis under assumption 1
gave cladogram 5 (707 steps, consistency index of 0.65, and retention index of
0.46; fig. 5.8f ) , and under assumption 0 it gave general area cladogram 1 (998
steps, consistency index of 0.65, and retention index of 0.47; fig. 5.8b ). Paralogy-
free subtree analysis under assumption 2 gave general area cladogram 1 (eight-
een steps, consistency index of 0.72, and retention index of 0.66; fig. 5.8b ). The
number of items of error calculated for these general area cladograms was 278
for cladogram 1, 314 for cladogram 2, 326 for cladogram 3, 288 for cladogram
 
Search WWH ::




Custom Search