Information Technology Reference
In-Depth Information
Damij, N., Damij, T., Grad, J., & Jelenc, F. (2008). A
methodology for business process improvement and
information system development. In Information and
Software Technology . Amsterdam: Elsevier. doi: 10.1016/
jinfsof.2007.11.004
Davenport, T., & Prusak, L. (1998). Conhecimento Em-
presarial: como as organizações gerenciam o seu capital
intelectual . Rio de Janeiro, Brasil: Campus.
Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived usefulness perceived ease
of use, and user acceptance of information technology.
Management Information Systems Quarterly , 13 (3),
319-340. doi:10.2307/249008
Danaher, P. J., & Rust, R. T. (1996). Indirect financial
benefits from service quality. Quality Management
Journal , 3 (2), 63-75.
Davis, F. D., Bagozzi, R. P., & Warshaw, P. R. (1989).
User acceptance of computer technology: a comparison
of two theoretical models. Management Science , 35 ,
982-1003. doi:10.1287/mnsc.35.8.982
Danese, P., Romano, P., & Vinelli, A. (2004). Manag-
ing business processes across supply networks: the role
of coordination mechanisms. Journal of Purchasing
and Supply Management , 10 , 165-177. doi:10.1016/j.
pursup.2004.11.002
Davis. (1993). User acceptance of information technology:
system characteristics, user perceptions and behavioral
impacts. International Journal of Man - Machine Stud-
ies, 38 , 475-487.
Daniel, E. M., & White, A. (2005). The future of inter-or-
ganisational system linkages: findings of an international
Delphi study. European Journal of Information Systems ,
14 (2), 188-203. doi:10.1057/palgrave.ejis.3000529
Dawes, R. M., Faust, D., & Meehl, P. E. (1989). Clini-
cal versus actuarial judgment. Science , 243 (4899),
1668-1674. doi:10.1126/science.2648573
Daniels, R. L., & Chambers, R. J. (1990). Multiobjective
flow-shop scheduling. Naval Research Logistics , 37 ,
981-995. doi:10.1002/1520-6750(199012)37:6<981::AID-
NAV3220370617>3.0.CO;2-H
De Boer, F. S., Bonsangue, M. M., Groenewegen, L. P.
J., Stam, A. W., Stevens, S., & Van Der Torre, L. (2005).
Change impact analysis of enterprise architectures. In
Proceedings of the 2005 IEEE International Confer-
ence on Information Reuse and Integration (IRI-2005)
(pp. 15-17).
Davenport, T. (1996). Holistic management of mega-
package change: The case of SAP . Boston: Center of
Business Innovation, Ernest & Young LLP.
Davenport, T. (1998). Ecologia da Informação: por que
só a tecnologia não basta para o sucesso na era da
informação . São Paulo, Brasil: Futura.
de Oliveira, A. (2004). Análise do investimento em
sistemas e tecnologias da informação e comunicação .
Lisboa, Portugal: Sílabo.
Davenport, T. (1998). Putting the Enterprise into the
Enterprise System. Harvard Business Review , 76 (4),
121-131.
De Pablos Heredero, C., & De Pablos Heredero, M.
(2008). Elements that can explain the degree of success
of ERP systems implementation . In Cruz-Cunha, M. M.
(Ed.), Social, Managerial and Organizational Dimen-
sions of Enterprise Information Systems . Hershey, PA:
IGI Publishing.
Davenport, T. (2000). Mission Critical . Boston: Harvard
Business School Press.
Davenport, T. (2000). Mission Critical: Realizing the
Promise of Enterprise Systems . Boston: Harvard Busi-
ness School Press.
Dekkers, J., Versendaal, J., & Batenburg, R. (2007).
Organizing for Business intelligence: A Framework for
aligning the use and development of information . Paper
presented at the Merging and Emerging Technologies,
Processes and Institutions.
Davenport, T. H., & Prusak, L. (2000). Working Knowl-
edge . Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.
Search WWH ::




Custom Search