Information Technology Reference
In-Depth Information
The operational objectives are:
as innovation very often has to account for vast
differences in cultural and socioeconomic condi-
tions. In order to be able to do so,
design engineers
need to develop a good level of competence about
the whole system they conceive, and about its
environment.
For the classic “non-integrated” design meth-
odology a lot of tools called “
Design for …
” have
been developed, which allow taking into account
one specific domain (assembly, maintenance,
manufacturing, etc.). Such tools are made to opti-
mize one specific view, disregarding the fact that
the global optimization of a system is in general
not to be achieved by the local optimization of a
series of components. Moreover, what normally
has to be a constraint for the system is transformed
into an objective function in these systems: Does an
assembly have to be minimized, or is it sufficient
to respect its operability if in another solution it
can be less costly or complicated?
Integrated product design considers that the
different constraints previously cited are the aim
of different actors who have to control them but
who “belong to the same world” (Boltanski &
Thevenot, 1991). The common goal is to reduce
the cost, to reduce the time to market, to take into
account sustainability and to increase quality. Such
actors have to work in a concurrent engineering
context, having access to a common product
model where they can have their own contextual
views. They have to respect the just need which
consists of giving a constraint on the system as
soon as possible if such a constraint can be proved
(Brissaud & Tichkiewitch, 2000).
Integrated product design thus does not seek
to optimize one single objective, but rather aims
at finding the best compromise solution under
multiple, often coupled restrictions that are im-
posed by the actors and environments of the whole
product lifecycle. They typically concern issues
like manufacturability, assembly/disassembly,
modularity, testability, product variant creation,
environmental sustainability, product-service
optimization, maintainability, cost minimization,
•
Creation, consolidation and development
of the INPRO network;
•
Initiation and development of jointly ex-
ecuted research activities;
•
Spreading of excellence.
The specific strategic objectives were realized
by the Joint Program of Activities. It consists of
managerial aspects for organizing the INPRO
network, but also the methods and tools that are
used for the virtual collaborative environment
development. This will support the building of
a knowledge sharing culture in INPRO virtual
organization.
The partners' collaboration and synergy in the
national research network INPRO (Draghici &
Draghici, 2007) was adapted to the actual require-
ments of product development. In this context, was
built a collaborative multisite platform for product
and its associated processes (Draghici, Savii &
Draghici, 2007), (Draghici, Savii & Draghici,
2008), that join together the methodological ap-
proach, methods and tools for Product Lifecycle
Management (PLM), Knowledge Management
(KM) and Human Resources Management (HRU).
In this chapter are presented: the product
lifecycle model which is the core of the proposed
collaborative product development methodol-
ogy, the human resources competencies database
development, and the multisite PLM platform
infrastructure.
product LifecYcLe ModeL
product Model development
Many of the world's most successful brands
create breakthrough ideas that are inspired by
a deep understanding of consumer's lives, their
needs and constraints, and use the principles of
design to innovate and build value. This is crucial
Search WWH ::
Custom Search