Image Processing Reference
In-Depth Information
Anderson JR, Hardy EE, Roach JT, Witmer RE (1976) A land use and land cover classification
system for use with remote sensor data. LIS Geological Survey Professional Paper 964. USGS,
Washington, DC
Baraldi A, Parmiggiani F (1990) Urban area classification by multispectral SPOT images. IEEE
Trans Geosci Remote Sens 28:674-680
Barnsley MJ, Steel AM, Barr SL (2003) Determining urban land use through an analysis of the
spatial composition of buildings identified in LIDAR and multispectral image data. In: Mesev V
(ed) Remotely sensed cities. Taylor & Francis, London, pp 83-108
Batty M, Longley PA (1994) Fractal cities: a geometry of form and function. Academic, London
Berthod M, Kato Z, Yu S, Zerubia L (1996) Bayesian image classification using Markov random
fields. Image Vis Comput 14:285-295
Brugioni DA (1983) The Census: it can be done more accurately with space-age technology.
Photogramm Eng Remote Sens 49:1337-1339
Carr JR (1999) Classification of digital image texture using variograms. In: Atkinson PM, Tate NJ
(eds) Advances in remote sensing and GIS analysis. Wiley, London, pp 135-146
Chen K (2002) An approach to linking remotely sensed data and areal census data. Int J Remote
Sens 23:37-48
Corbley KP (1996) One-meter satellites. Geo Inf Syst July:28-42
Couloigner I, Ranchin T (2000) Mapping of urban areas: a multiresolution modelling approach
for semi-automatic extraction of streets. Photogramm Eng Remote Sens 66:867-874
Cowan DJ, Jensen JR (1998) Extraction and modeling of urban attributes using remote sensing
technology. In: Liverman DM, Moran EF, Rindfuss EE, Stern PC (eds) People and pixels.
National Academy Press, Washington, DC, pp 164-188
Dobson JE (1993) Land cover, land use differences distinct. GIS World 6(2):20-22
Donnay JP (1999) Use of remote sensing information in planning. In: Stillwell J, Geertman S,
Openshaw S (eds) Geographical information and planning. Springer, Berlin, pp 242-260
Dreyer P (1993) Classification of land cover using optimized neural nets on SPOT data.
Photogramm Eng Remote Sens 59:617-621
Fisher PF (1997) The pixel: a snare and a delusion. Int J Remote Sens 18:679-685
Forster BC (1985) An examination of some problems and solutions in monitoring urban areas
from satellite platforms. Int J Remote Sens 6:139-151
Geoghegan J, L P, Ogneva-Himmelberger Jr Y, Chowdhury RR, Sanderson S, Turner BL (1998)
“Socializing the pixel” and “pixelizing the social” in land use and land cover-change. In:
Liverman DM, Moran EF, Rindfuss EE, Stern PC (eds) People and pixels. National Academy
Press, Washington, DC, pp 51-69
Grey WMF, Luckman AJ, Holland D (2003) Mapping urban change in the UK using radar inter-
ferometry. Remote Sens Environ 87:16-22
Haralick RM, Shanmugam K, Dinstein I (1973) Textural features for image classification. IEEE
Trans Syst Man Cybern 3:610-621
Harvey JT (2002) Estimating census district populations from satellite imagery: Some approaches
and limitations. Int J Remote Sens 23:2071-2095
Hasse J, Lathrop RG (2003) A housing-level approach to characterizing residential sprawl.
Photogramm Eng Remote Sens 69:1021-1030
Heikkonen J, Varfis A (1998) A land cover/land use classification of urban areas: a remote sensing
approach. Int J Pattern Recognit Artif Intell 12:475-489
Herold M, Scepan J, Clarke KC (2002) The use of remote sensing and landscape metrics to
describe structures and changes in urban land uses. Environ Plann A 34:1443-1458
Ji M, Jensen JR (1999) Effectiveness of subpixel analysis in detecting and quantifying urban
imperviousness from Landsat Thematic Mapper imagery. Geocarto Int 14(4):33-41
Lam NSN, Quattrochi DA, Qiu HL, Zhao W (1998) Environmental assessment and monitoring
with image characterization and modeling system using multi-scale remote sensing data. Appl
Geogr Stud 2:77-93
Search WWH ::

Custom Search