Environmental Engineering Reference
In-Depth Information
motivations to 'do the right thing' could also help shift apathy regarding stakeholders'
limited ability to adapt to climate impacts (i.e. forced change) to motivations for
engaging in a collaborative process for resolving local and regional challenges (i.e.
intentionality). The learning and information related elements in the previous chap-
ter relate to how the different governance levels can contribute to finding this bal-
ance to address the different informational needs for proactive and reactive adaptive
capacities. These steps could enhance the cohesiveness of cross-sector action and
ingenuity of the approaches at the watershed level.
References
Akerlof K, Rowan KE, Fitzgerald D, Cedeno AY (2012) Communication of climate projections in
US media amid politicization of model science. Nat Clim Chang. Advance online publication.
http://www.nature.com/nclimate/journal/vaop/ncurrent/abs/nclimate1542.
Balint PJ, Stewardt RE, Desai A, Walters LC (2011) Wicked environmental problems: managing
uncertainty and conflict. Island Press, Washington, DC
Brunner RD (1996) Policy and global change research: a modest proposal. Clim Chang
32(2):121-147
Crompton T (2008) Weathercocks and signposts: the environment movement at a crossroads.
World Wildlife Fund, UK
Dawnay E, Shah H (2005) Extending the “rational man” model of human behaviour: seven key
principles. Briefing note for the Environment Agency by NEF. New Economics Foundation,
London
Engle NL (2010) Adaptation to extreme droughts in Arizona, Georgia, and South Carolina: evalu-
ating adaptive capacity and innovative planning and management approaches for states and
their community water systems. University of Michigan, Ann Arbor
Folke C, Carpenter S, Elmqvist T, Gunderson L, Holling CS, Walker B (2002) Resilience and
sustainable development: building adaptive capacity in a world of transformations. Ambio
31(5):437-440
Frederick S, Loewenstein G, O'Donoghue T (2002) Time discounting and time preference: a criti-
cal review. J Econ Lit 40(2):351-401
Frey BS, Benz M, Stutzer A (2004) Introducing procedural utility: not only what, but also how
matters. J Inst Theor Econ 160:377-401
Gladwell M (2000) The tipping point. Little, Brown and Company, Boston
Huntjens P, Pahl-Wostl C, Rihoux B, Schlüter M, Flachner Z, Neto S, Koskova R, Dickens C,
Nabide Kiti I (2011) Adaptive water management and policy learning in a changing climate: a
formal comparative analysis of eight water management regimes in Europe, Africa and Asia.
Environmen Policy Gov 21:145-163
Iza A, Stein R (2009) RULE - reforming water governance. IUCN, Gland
Jackson T (2005) Motivating sustainable consumption: a review of evidence on consumer behav-
iour and behavioural change. Report to the Sustainable Development Research Network.
Centre for Environmental Strategy. University of Surrey, Guildford, UK
Kahneman D, Knetsch JL, Thaler RH (1991) Anomalies: the endowment effect, loss aversion, and
status quo bias. J Econ Perspect 5(1):193-206
Kane SM, Yohe GW (2000) Societal adaptation to climate variability and change: an introduction.
Clim Chang 45(1):1-4
Kaplan S (2000) Human nature and environmentally responsible behavior. J Soc Issues
56(3):491-508
Search WWH ::
Custom Search