Information Technology Reference
In-Depth Information
(2) Since c ij =
1 if and only if A i =
,
=
,
,...,
A j , i
j
1
2
m , it yields
c ij =
ma k {
min
{
c ik ,
c kj }} =
1 if and only if A i =
A k =
A j ,
k
=
1
,
2
,...,
m (2.82)
(3) Since c ij =
c ji , i
,
j
=
1
,
2
,...,
m , we get
c ij =
ma k {
min
{
c ik ,
c kj }} =
ma k {
min
{
c ki ,
c jk }}
=
ma k {
min
{
c jk ,
c ki }} =
c ji ,
i
,
j
=
1
,
2
,...,
m
(2.83)
which completes the proof of the theorem.
According to Theorem 2.8, we can derive the following conclusion:
= (
c ij ) m × m be an association matrix. Then for
Theorem 2.9 (Xu et al. 2008) Let C
any positive integer k ,wehave
C 2 k + 1
C 2 k
C 2 k
=
(2.84)
where the composition matrix C 2 k + 1
is also an association matrix.
Definition 2.11 (Xu et al. 2008) Let C
= (
c ij ) m × m be an association matrix. If
C 2
C , i.e., for any i
,
j
=
1
,
2
,...,
m , the following inequality holds:
ma k {
min
{
c ik ,
c kj }} ≤
c ij
(2.85)
Thus, C is called an equivalent association matrix.
By the transitivity principle of equivalent matrix (Wang 1983), we can easily
prove the following theorem:
Theorem 2.10 (Xu et al. 2008) Let C
= (
c ij ) m × m be an association matrix. Then
after the finite times of compositions:
C 2 k
C 2
C 4
C
→ ··· →
→ ···
(2.86)
there must exist a positive integer k , such that C 2 k
C 2 ( k + 1 ) , and C 2 k
=
is also an
equivalent association matrix.
Based on the equivalent association matrix, we give the following useful concept:
Definition 2.12 (Xu et al. 2008) Let C
= (
c ij ) m × m be an equivalent association
matrix. Then C
λ = ( λ
c ij ) m × m is called the
λ
-cutting matrix of C , where
0
,
c ij <λ,
c ij =
c ij λ, ,
,
=
,
,...,
i
j
1
2
m
(2.87)
λ
1
,
λ
λ ∈[
,
]
and
is the confidence level with
0
1
.
 
 
Search WWH ::




Custom Search