Information Technology Reference
In-Depth Information
(2) Since
c
ij
=
1 if and only if
A
i
=
,
=
,
,...,
A
j
,
i
j
1
2
m
, it yields
c
ij
=
ma
k
{
min
{
c
ik
,
c
kj
}} =
1 if and only if
A
i
=
A
k
=
A
j
,
k
=
1
,
2
,...,
m
(2.82)
(3) Since
c
ij
=
c
ji
,
i
,
j
=
1
,
2
,...,
m
, we get
c
ij
=
ma
k
{
min
{
c
ik
,
c
kj
}} =
ma
k
{
min
{
c
ki
,
c
jk
}}
=
ma
k
{
min
{
c
jk
,
c
ki
}} =
c
ji
,
i
,
j
=
1
,
2
,...,
m
(2.83)
which completes the proof of the theorem.
According to Theorem 2.8, we can derive the following conclusion:
=
(
c
ij
)
m
×
m
be an association matrix. Then for
Theorem 2.9
(Xu et al. 2008) Let
C
any positive integer
k
,wehave
C
2
k
+
1
C
2
k
C
2
k
=
◦
(2.84)
where the composition matrix
C
2
k
+
1
is also an association matrix.
Definition 2.11
(Xu et al. 2008) Let
C
=
(
c
ij
)
m
×
m
be an association matrix. If
C
2
⊆
C
, i.e., for any
i
,
j
=
1
,
2
,...,
m
, the following inequality holds:
ma
k
{
min
{
c
ik
,
c
kj
}} ≤
c
ij
(2.85)
Thus,
C
is called an equivalent association matrix.
By the transitivity principle of equivalent matrix (Wang 1983), we can easily
prove the following theorem:
Theorem 2.10
(Xu et al. 2008) Let
C
=
(
c
ij
)
m
×
m
be an association matrix. Then
after the finite times of compositions:
C
2
k
C
2
C
4
C
→
→
→ ··· →
→ ···
(2.86)
there must exist a positive integer
k
, such that
C
2
k
C
2
(
k
+
1
)
, and
C
2
k
=
is also an
equivalent association matrix.
Based on the equivalent association matrix, we give the following useful concept:
Definition 2.12
(Xu et al. 2008) Let
C
=
(
c
ij
)
m
×
m
be an equivalent association
matrix. Then
C
λ
=
(
λ
c
ij
)
m
×
m
is called the
λ
-cutting matrix of
C
, where
0
,
c
ij
<λ,
c
ij
=
c
ij
≥
λ,
,
,
=
,
,...,
i
j
1
2
m
(2.87)
λ
1
,
λ
λ
∈[
,
]
and
is the confidence level with
0
1
.
Search WWH ::
Custom Search