Information Technology Reference
In-Depth Information
communities of practice in end-user Web devel-
opment.
Finally, the current study raises several po-
tential areas for further study. As end-user Web
development is likely to increase in the future,
better guidelines are needed to help identify
applications that are particularly suited for end
users with a particular background. The differ-
ent types of Web applications developed by end
users carry different risks and so future studies
should differentiate between types of applications
in order to further clarify the associated risks.
The participants of the present study identified
training as one of the most significant factors in
reducing the risk associated with end-user devel-
oped Web pages, yet users appear to be gaining
their knowledge from self training rather than
formal training. This role of self training should
be further investigated. Additional studies are
also needed to further examine the reasons for
Web page development, as it appears that the sat-
isfaction derived from end-user Web development
may overshadow the risks associated with these
applications that are accessible to vast numbers
of people from all over the world.
Alavi, M., Phillips, J. S., & Freedman, S. M.
(1990). An empirical investigation of two alterna-
tive approaches to control of end-user application
development process. Data Base, 20 (4), 11-19.
Alavi, M., & Weiss, I. R. (1985-1986). Managing
the risks associated with end-user computing.
Journal of Management Information Systems,
2 (3), 5-20.
Amoroso, D. L., & Cheney, P. H. (1992). Quality
end user-developed applications: Some essential
ingredients. Data Base, 23 (1), 1-11.
Atkinson, M., & Kydd, C. (1997). Individual char-
acteristics associated with World Wide Web use:
An empirical study of playfulness and motivation.
The DATA BASE for Advances in Information
Systems, 28 (2), 53-62.
Benham, H., Delaney, M., & Luzi, A. (1993).
Structured techniques for successful end user
spreadsheets. Journal of End User Computing,
5 (2), 18-25.
Benson, D. H. (1983). A field study of end user
computing: Findings and issues. MIS Quarterly,
7 (4), 35-45.
Bergeron, F., & Berube, C. (1988). The manage-
ment of the end-user environment: An empirical
investigation. Information & Management, 14 ,
107-113.
reFerenCes
Agarwal, R. (2000). Individual acceptance
of information technologies. In R. W. Zmud
(Ed.), Framing the domains of IT management:
Projecting the future ... through the past (pp.
85-104). Cincinnati, OH: Pinnaflex Educational
Resources, Inc.
Bowman, B. (1988). An investigation of applica-
tion development process controls. Unpublished
doctoral dissertation, University of Houston.
Bowman, B. (1990). Controlling application
development by end-users in a PC environment:
A survey of techniques. Information Executive,
32 (2), 70-74.
Aggarwal, A. K. (2003). Internetalization of
end-users. Journal of End User Computing,
15 (1), 54-56.
Brancheau, J. C., & Brown, C. V. (1993). The
management of end-user computing: Status
and directions. ACM Computing Surveys, 25 (4),
450-482.
Alavi, M., Nelson, R. R., & Weiss, I. R. (1987-
1988). Strategies for end user computing: An
integrative framework. Journal of Management
Information Systems, 4 (3), 28-49.
Search WWH ::




Custom Search