The Organization of End User Development in an Accounting Company - End User Computing Challenges and Technologies: Emerging Tools and Applications - page 122

Engeström, Y. (1987). Learning by expanding: An
activity-theoretical approach to developmental
research. Helsinki: Orienta-Konsultit.

Kaasbøll, J., & Øgrim, L. (1994). Super-users:
Hackers, management hostages or working class
heroes? A study of user influence on redesign in
distributed organizations. In Proceedings of the
17th Information Systems Research Seminar in
Scandinavia (IRIS-17) (pp. 784-798). Department
of Information Processing Science, University of
Oulu, Finland.

Engeström, Y. (2001). Expansive learning at
work: Towards an activity theoretical reconcep-
tualization. Journal of Education and Work, 14 ,
133-156.

Fischer, G., & Girgensohn, A. (1990). End-user
modifiability in design environments. In Pro-
ceedings of the Conference on Human Factors
in Computing Systems (CHI'90) (pp. 183-192).
New York: ACM Press.

Kanstrup, A-M. (2004). E-learning behind the
facade: The value of local gardeners. In A.M.
Kanstrup, A.M. Roskilde, & D.K. Universites-
forlag (Eds.), E-learning at work (pp. 149-166,
in Danish).

Fischer, G., Giaccardi, E., Ye, Y., Sutcliffe, A.G., &
Mehandjiev, N. (2004). Meta-design: A manifesto
for end-user development. Communications of the
ACM, 47 (9), 33-37.

Kaptelinin, V. (1996). Activity theory: Implica-
tions for human-computer interaction. In B. Nardi
(Ed.), Context and consciousness: Activity theory
and human-computer interaction (pp. 103-116).
Cambridge: MIT Press. Fischer, G., & Lemke, A.C. (1988). Constrained

design processes: Steps toward convivial comput-
ing. In R. Guindon (Ed.), Cognitive science and
its application for human-computer interaction
(pp. 1-58). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

Kuutti, K. (1996). Activity theory as a potential
framework for human-computer interaction
research. In B. Nardi (Ed.), Context and con-
sciousness: Activity theory and human-computer
interaction (pp. 17-44). Cambridge: MIT Press.

Gantt, M., & Nardi, B. (1992). Gardeners and
gurus: Patterns of cooperation among CAD users.
In Proceedings of the Conference on Computer-
Human Interaction (CHI '92) (pp. 107-117). New
York: ACM Press.

Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning:
Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge:
University Press.

Lieberman, H., Paterno, F., & Wulf, V. (Eds.).
(2006). End-user development . Berlin: Springer-
Verlag.

Grudin, J. (1991). Interactive systems: Bridging
the gaps between developers and users. IEEE
Computer, 24 (4), 59-69.

Mackay, W.E. (1990). Patterns of sharing
customizable software. In Proceedings of the
Conference on Computer Supported Coopera-
tive Work (CSCW'90) (pp. 209-221). New York:
ACM Press.

Guribye, F. (2005). Infrastructures for learn-
ing: Ethnographic inquiries into the social and
technical conditions for education and training.
Doctoral thesis, University of Bergen, Norway,
Department of Information Science and Media
Studies. MacLean, A., Carter, K., Lövstrand, L., & Moran,

T. (1990). User-tailorable systems: Pressing the
issue with buttons. In Proceedings of the Confer-
ence on Human Factors in Computing Systems
(CHI'90) (pp. 175-182). New York: ACM Press.

Hollan, J., Hutchins, E., & Kirsh, D. (2000).
Distributed cognition: Toward a new foundation
for human-computer interaction research. ACM
Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction,
7 (2), 174-196.