Civil Engineering Reference
In-Depth Information
At another level when we use natural languages in intelligent systems, the
imprecision is described by fuzzy sets which generalize ordinary sets. We are talking
about random fuzzy sets.
2
The Belief Function Approach to Combining Evidence
Generalizing Bayesian statistics, Dempster ( 1967 )and Shafer ( 1976 ) considered an
approach to quantify evidence by using uncertainty measures under the name of
belief functions. The framework is this.
A “true state of nature” u o is known to be in some finite set U , although it is not
known which element of U is that true state. For each subset A
U , we express
our “belief” that A contains u o by a number, denoted as F
(
A
)
. Such a number
F
could come from some “evidence.” We are talking about modeling/quantifying
information provided by evidence, i.e., some mathematical theory of evidence.
A belief function on a finite set U is a set function F :2 U
(
A
)
[
0
,
1
]
such that
(i) F
(∅)=
0, F
(
U
)=
1
2 U ,
(ii) For any n
2, and any A 1 ,
A 2 ,...,
A n
n
i = 1 A i )
) | I | + 1 F
F
(
(
1
( j I A j ) ,
(6)
=
I
⊆{
1
,
2
,...,
n
}
denotes the cardinality of the set I .
Example [belief functions as distributions of random sets, see Nguyen ( 1978 ,
2012 )]
Let
where
|
I
|
( Ω ,A ,
P
)
be a probability space and
(
V
,V )
be an arbitrary measurable
V is called a random element if X 1
space. A map X :
Ω
( V ) ⊆ A
, and its
PX 1
probability law is the probability measure P X =
on
V
.For U a finite set, and
2 U is called a nonempty random
set whose probability law is completely determined by its distribution function
F :2 U
2 U ,
being the power set of 2 U , X :
V
=
V
Ω
[
0
,
1
]
,definedby
F
(
A
)=
P
(
X
A
) .
(7)
Now, clearly F
(∅)=
0and F
(
U
)=
1. Moreover, F
( . )
is infinitely monotone.
2 U ,and A i
2 U , i
Indeed, for B
=
1
,
2
,...,
n ,let
J
(
B
)= {
i :
such that B
A i }.
(8)
We h ave
n
i = 1 A i )=
B ⊆∪
F
(
F
(
B
)
F
(
B
) .
(9)
n
i = 1 A i
B
U
,
J
(
B
) =∅
Search WWH ::




Custom Search