Information Technology Reference
In-Depth Information
s
k
=
n
j
=
1
c
−
1
j
then
c
i
r
i
=
k
,
i
=
1
,
2
,...,
n
.
(3.36)
n
∑
n
∑
and from (
3.36
) and the relation
x
i
=
r
i
=
s
we have
i
=
1
i
=
1
n
i
=
1
c
i
x
i
=
n
i
=
1
c
i
(
x
i
−
r
i
)
n
i
=
1
c
i
r
i
2
+
and the proof is complete.
If we denote
x
=(
x
1
,
x
2
,...,
x
n
)
and therefore
r
=(
r
1
,
r
2
,...,
r
n
)
, equality (
3.35
) can
be written briefly as
f
(
x
)=
f
(
r
)+
f
(
x
−
r
)
.
(3.37)
From Lemma
5
we obtain the following considerations.
Remark 1.
For any non-negative
x
=(
x
1
,
x
2
,...,
x
n
)
and
y
=(
y
1
,
y
2
,...,
y
n
)
such that
n
∑
n
∑
x
i
=
s
and
y
i
=
s
, (integers or real), it follows that
i
=
1
i
=
1
n
∑
i
=
1
n
∑
i
=
1
n
∑
i
=
1
n
∑
i
=
1
c
i
x
i
≤
c
i
y
i
⇔
2
2
,
(a)
c
i
(
x
i
−
r
i
)
≤
c
i
(
y
i
−
r
i
)
(b)
f
(
x
)
−
f
(
y
)=
f
(
x
−
r
)
−
f
(
y
−
r
)
.
Therefore, finding the point
¯
α
=(
α
1
,
α
2
,...,
α
n
)
with
α
i
integers, which minimizes
is equivalent to finding the point
¯
f
(
s
)=
f
(
s
1
,
s
2
,...,
s
n
)
α
which minimizes
f
(
s
−
n
∑
r
)=
f
(
s
1
−
r
1
,
s
2
−
r
2
,...,
s
n
−
r
n
)
where
s
=(
s
1
,
s
2
,...,
s
n
)
,
s
i
are integers,
s
i
=
s
,
i
=
1
and
r
=(
r
1
,
r
2
,...,
r
n
)
,the
r
i
given by (
3.34
).
Once the real numbers given by (
3.34
) have been obtained we determine the integers
a
1
,
a
2
, ...,
a
n
, such that
a
i
−
1
/
2
≤
r
i
<
a
i
+
1
/
2
that is to say
[
r
i
]
if
[
r
i
]
≤
r
i
≤
[
r
i
]+
1
/
2
=
a
i
(3.38)
[
r
i
]+
1if
[
r
i
]+
1
/
2
<
r
i
<
[
r
i
]+
1
where
[
x
]
denotes the integer part of
x
.
Now let us write
b
i
=
r
i
−
a
i
(3.39)
and
n
i
=
1
a
i
,
d
=
s
−
(3.40)
Search WWH ::
Custom Search