Information Technology Reference
In-Depth Information
s
k
=
n
j = 1 c 1
j
then
c i r i =
k
,
i
=
1
,
2
,...,
n
.
(3.36)
n
n
and from ( 3.36 ) and the relation
x i =
r i =
s we have
i
=
1
i
=
1
n
i = 1 c i x i =
n
i = 1 c i ( x i r i )
n
i = 1 c i r i
2
+
and the proof is complete.
If we denote x
=(
x 1
,
x 2
,...,
x n
)
and therefore r
=(
r 1
,
r 2
,...,
r n
)
, equality ( 3.35 ) can
be written briefly as
f
(
x
)=
f
(
r
)+
f
(
x
r
) .
(3.37)
From Lemma 5 we obtain the following considerations.
Remark 1. For any non-negative x
=(
x 1 ,
x 2 ,...,
x n )
and y
=(
y 1 ,
y 2 ,...,
y n )
such that
n
n
x i
=
s and
y i
=
s , (integers or real), it follows that
i
=
1
i
=
1
n
i = 1
n
i = 1
n
i = 1
n
i = 1
c i x i
c i y i
2
2 ,
(a)
c i (
x i
r i )
c i (
y i
r i )
(b) f
(
x
)
f
(
y
)=
f
(
x
r
)
f
(
y
r
)
.
Therefore, finding the point ¯
α =( α 1 , α 2 ,..., α n )
with
α i integers, which minimizes
is equivalent to finding the point ¯
f
(
s
)=
f
(
s 1 ,
s 2 ,...,
s n )
α
which minimizes f
(
s
n
r
)=
f
(
s 1
r 1 ,
s 2
r 2 ,...,
s n
r n )
where s
=(
s 1 ,
s 2 ,...,
s n )
, s i are integers,
s i =
s ,
i
=
1
and r
=(
r 1 ,
r 2 ,...,
r n )
,the r i given by ( 3.34 ).
Once the real numbers given by ( 3.34 ) have been obtained we determine the integers
a 1 , a 2 , ..., a n , such that
a i
1
/
2
r i <
a i +
1
/
2
that is to say
[
r i
]
if
[
r i
]
r i
[
r i
]+
1
/
2
=
a i
(3.38)
[
r i
]+
1if
[
r i
]+
1
/
2
<
r i
< [
r i
]+
1
where
[
x
]
denotes the integer part of x
.
Now let us write
b i =
r i
a i
(3.39)
and
n
i = 1 a i ,
d
=
s
(3.40)
Search WWH ::




Custom Search