Information Technology Reference
In-Depth Information
1
−
ib
1
−
ib
≤
λ
<
+
1
.
(9.2)
i
a
a
Thus a covering of [0,1] having precisely
i
intervals of length
b
must have at least
λ
i
intervals of length
a
.
Since our (mixed) Defender strategy in
will involve the same “number”
of intervals of length
a
as of length
b
, the associated coverings will be a balance of
two types;
Γ
F
(
a
,
b
)
(i) Those that have more intervals of length
b
than intervals of length
a
and
(ii) Those that have at least as many intervals of length
a
as those of length
b
.
Λ
+
and
Λ
−
defined by
As a consequence the sets
Λ
+
=
Λ
+
(
Λ
−
=
Λ
−
(
a
,
b
)=
{
i
:
i
>
λ
i
}
and
a
,
b
)=
{
i
:
i
≤
λ
i
}
(9.3)
will play a prominent role and feature in our expression for the game value.
9.3 An Illustrative Example
In the next section we prove a theorem that gives a lower bound for the value of our
game. Its proof takes an arbitrary optimal strategy for Defender and shows that it
must have a certain structure. The arguments to do this are somewhat technical so,
in this section, we provide an example which illustrates them.
0
20
5
20
7
20
8
20
10
12
13
15
20
20
20
20
20
20
Fig. 9.1
An optimal Defender strategy when
a
=
5
/
20 and
b
=
8
/
20
Search WWH ::
Custom Search