Agriculture Reference
In-Depth Information
. 31.. Josling,.T..and.Tangermann,.S.,.Implementation.of.the.WTO.agreement.on.agriculture.
and.developments.for.the.next.round.of.negotiations,.
European Review of Agricultural
Economics
,.26(3),.371,.1999.
. 32.. Pew. Initiative. on. Food. and. Biotechnology,. Mellman. Group/Public. Opinion.
Strategies,.Public.sentiment.about.genetically.modiied.food,.2005..Available.online:.
http://www.pewtrusts.org/news_room_detail.aspx?id=32804.(accessed.on.February.2,.
2011).
. 33..
Eurobarometer 55.2
,. Europeans,. science. and. technology,. European. Commission,.
Public. Opinion.Analysis,. Brussels,. 2001. [cited. 20. December. 2002],. 62pp..Available.
from. Internet:. http://ec.europa.eu/research/press/2001/pr0612.en-report.pdf. (accessed.
on.February.2,.2011).
. 34.. Huffman,.W..E..et.al.,.The.effects.of.prior.beliefs.and.learning.on.consumers'.accep-
tance.of.genetically.modiied.foods,.
Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization
,.
63(1),193,.2007.
. 35.. Bredahl,. L.,. Determinants. of. consumer. attitudes. and. purchase. intentions. with. regard.
to.genetically.modiied.food—Results.of.a.cross-national.survey,.
Journal of Consumer
Policy
,.24(1),.2001.
. 36.. Lusk,. J.. L.,. Effects. of. cheap. talk. on. consumer. willingness-to-pay. for. golden. rice,.
American Journal of Agricultural Economics
,.85(4),.840,.2003.
. 37.. Lusk,.J..L..and.Rozan,.A.,.Consumer.acceptance.of.biotechnology.and.the.role.of.second.
generation.technologies.in.the.USA.and.Europe,.
Trends in Biotechnology
,.23(8),.386,.2005.
. 38.. Moon,.W..and.Balasubramanian,.S..K.,.Willingness.to.pay.for.non-biotech.foods.in.the.
US.and.UK,.
Journal of Consumer Affairs
,.37(2),.317,.2003.
. 39.. Chen,.H..and.Chern,.W..S.,.Consumer.acceptance.of.genetically.modiied.foods,.paper.
presented. at.
Annual Meeting of the American Agricultural Economics Association
,.
Long.Beach,.CA,.2002.
. 40.. Onyango,.B.,.Govindasamy,.R.,.and.Nayga.Jr.,.R..M.,.An.application.of.choice.modeling.
to.measure.US.consumer.preferences.for.genetically.modiied.foods,.paper.presented.at.
the.
American Agricultural Economics Association Annual Meeting
,.Denver,.CO,.2004.
. 41.. Lusk,. J.. L.. et. al., Effect. of. information. about. beneits. of. biotechnology. on. consumer.
acceptance. of genetically. modiied. food:. Evidence. from. experimental. auctions. in. the.
United.States, England,. and. France,.
European Review of Agricultural Economics
,.31(2),.
179,.2004.
. 42.. Frewer,.L..J.,.Howard,.C.,.and.Shepherd,.R.,.The.inluence.of.realistic.product.exposure.on.
attitudes.towards.genetic.engineering.of.food,.
Food Quality and Preference
,.7(1),.61,.1996.
. 43.. Mucci,.A..and.Hough,.G.,.Perceptions.of.genetically.modiied.foods.by.consumers.in.
Argentina,.
Food Quality and Preference
,.15(1),.43,.2004.
. 44.. Chern,. W.. S.. and. Rickertsen,. K.,. A. comparative. analysis. of. consumer. acceptance.
of. GM. foods. in. Norway. and. the. United. States,. paper. presented. at.
6th International
Conference on Agricultural Biotechnology: New Avenues for Production, Consumption,
and Technology Transfer
,.Ravello,.Italy,.2002.
. 45.. Bernauer,.T.,.
Genes
,.
Trade
,.
and Regulation
,.Princeton.University.Press,.Princeton,.NJ,.2003.
. 46.. Hoban,.T..J.,.Trends.in.consumer.attitudes.about.agricultural.biotechnology,.
AgBioForum
,.
1(1),.3,.1998.
. 47.. Runge,. C.. F.,. Bagnara,. G.. L.,. and. Jackson,. L.. A.,. Differing. US. and. European. per-
spectives. on. GMOs:. Political,. economic. and. cultural. issues,.
Estey Centre Journal of
International Law and Trade Policy
,.2(2),.221,.2001.
. 48.. Sheldon,. I.. M.,. Regulation. of. biotechnology:. Will. we. ever. “freely”. trade. GMOs?.
European Review of Agricultural Economics
,.29(1),.155,.2002.
. 49.. Graff,.G..D..and.Zilberman,.D.,.Explaining.Europe's.resistance.to.agricultural.biotech-
nology,.
Agricultural and Resource Economics Update
,.7(5),.1,.2004.
Search WWH ::
Custom Search