Chemistry Reference
In-Depth Information
the corrections given in Chapter 7 should be applied to obtain integrated intensities
equivalent to the value from the Bragg-Brentano geometry.
The integrated intensities of each phase can also be obtained by area integration
over the defined regions for each peak. Then, the reflection factors should be
determined experimentally by measuring samples with a known percentage of
retained austenite (and carbide). The number of samples with different percentages
of retained austenite for calibration should be the same or more than the number
of reflection factors to be determined. Calibration by experimental method is
especially preferred for the integrated intensity determined by area integration. The
“reflection factors” determined experimentally contain all the instrument factors or
corrections. No further correction is necessary as long as the instrument condition and
the integration regions are the same. The maximum integrated area for each phase
can be used as long as it is consistent with the calibration. Background subtraction
may be avoided if a low noise photon-counting detector is used.
REFERENCES
1. L. E. Alexander, X-Ray Diffraction Methods in Polymer Science, Krieger Publishing
Company, Malabar, FL, 1985.
2. N. Kasai and M. Kakudo, X-Ray Diffraction by Macromolecules, Kodansha and Springer,
Tokyo, 2005, 393-417.
3. N. S. Murthy and H. Minor, General procedure for evaluating amorphous scattering and
crystallinity from X-ray diffraction scans of semicrystalline polymers, Polymer 1990,
31, 996-1002.
4. N. S. Murthy, H. Minor, M. K. Akkapeddi, and B. V. Buskirk, Characterization of polymer
blends and alloys by constrained profile-analysis of X-ray diffraction scans, J. Appl.
Polym. Sci. 1990, 41, 2265-2272.
5. K. B. Schwartz, et al., Crystallinity and unit cell variations in linear high-density
polyethylene, Adv. X-Ray Anal. 1995, 38, 495-502.
6. N. S. Murthy and R. Barton Jr., Polymer industry, Industrial Applications of X-Ray
Diffraction, edited by F. H. Chung and D. K. Smith, Marcel Dekker, New York, 2000,
495-509.
7. S. Krimm and A. V. Tobolsky, Quantitative X-ray studies of order in amorphous and
crystalline polymers. Quantitative X-ray determination of crystallinity in polyethylene,
J. Polym. Sci. 1951, 7, 57-76.
8. C. G. Vonk, Computerization of Rulands X-ray method for determination of the
crystallinity in polymers, J. Appl. Crystallogr. 1973, 6, 148-152.
9. S. Polizzi, et al., A fitting method for the determination of crystallinity by means of X-ray
diffraction, J. Appl. Crystallogr. 1990, 23, 359-365.
10. C. G. Vonk and G. Fagherazzi, The determination of the crystallinity in glass-ceramic
materials by the method of Ruland, J. Appl. Crystallogr. 1983, 16, 274-276.
11. F. H. Chung and R. W. Scott, A new approach to the determination of crystallinity
of polymers by X-ray diffraction, J. Appl. Crystallogr. 1973, 6, 225-230.
Search WWH ::




Custom Search