Phoenix as Everycity: A Closer Look at Sprawl in the Desert - Design with the Desert: Conservation and Sustainable Development - page 265

on August 27, 1997). For national statistics on the costs of growth, see also N. Newman, Fiscal
impacts of alternative land development patterns: The costs of current development versus
compact growth (Detroit, MI: Southeast Michigan Council of Governments Final Report, Eds.
R. Burchell and N. Newman, June 1997), Issues and facts: Urban service areas for New Mexico
(Albuqueque:1000 Friends of New Mexico, No. 2, Fall 1997), and, Alternatives for future
growth in California's Central Valley: The bottom line (Washington, DC: American Farmland
Trust, Summary Report, October 1995).
27. Arizona Revised Statutes 9-463.05.
28. Yantis, J., Valley, state make leaps in growth—Experts fear increased numbers could mean
LA-like nightmares. Tribune Newspapers , December 31, 1997.
29. Orfield, M., Metropolitics (Washington, DC: Brookings Institute, 1997).
30. Guhathakurta, S., Who pays for growth in the city of Phoenix? An equity-based perspective on
suburbanization, Urban Affairs Annual Review 33(5), 813-838, 1998.
31. Endangered by sprawl (Washington, DC: National Wildlife Federation, 2005).
32. See Arizona 2007 tourism facts year-end summary. Phoenix, AZ: Office of Tourism, http://
www.azot.gov/documents/2007_AOT_Tourism_Facts.pdf (accessed July 23, 2009).
33. See Snowbird business down in East Valley, The Arizona Republic , February 2, 2000; Snowbird
flock is shrinking, The Arizona Republic , July 20, 2001.
34. Sustainability for Arizona (Tempe, AZ: Morrison Institute for Public Policy, Arizona State
University, November 2007).
35. Smart growth policies: An evaluation of programs and outcomes (Cambridge, MA: Lincoln
Institute of Land Policy, May 2009).
36. Nelson, A. C. and J. B. Duncan, Growth Management: Principles and Practice (Chicago, IL:
American Planning Association, 1996).
37. Meck, S. et al., Planning communities for the 21st century (Chicago, IL: American Planning
Association, December 1999).
38. Conservation easements. Phoenix, AZ: The Nature Conservancy of Arizona, July 2007,
http://www.nature.org/wherewework/northamerica/states/arizona/files/new_ce_az.pdf
(accessed July 23, 2009).
39. Community redevelopment law: Your guide to California's redevelopment law. Sacramento,
CA: MHA, McDonough Holland & Allen PC: Attorneys at Law, http://www.mhalaw.com/
mha/practices/publicLawPubs/MHA_CRL_2009_updated.pdf (accessed July 23, 2009).
40. Inclusionary housing initiative. St. Paul, MN: Alliance for Metropolitan Stability Minneapolis,
http://www.policylink.org/pdfs/EDTK/IZ/Alliance.pdf (accessed July 23, 2009).
41. Light-rail ridership rises in February, East Valley Tribune , March 16, 2009.
42. National Association of Realtors, 2007 Housing Opportunity Pulse Survey by Public Opinion
Strategies, Alexandria, VA. Key findings from a national survey of 1000 adults conducted
October 5, http://www.cityofphoenix.gov/citygovernment/awards/index.html 7, 9-10, 2007.