Environmental Engineering Reference
In-Depth Information
84. Goode, M.J., W.C. Horace, M.J. Sredl, and J.M. Howland, Habitat destruction by collectors
associated with decreased abundance of rock-dwelling lizards,
Biological Conservation
125:
47-54, 2005.
85. Bonier, F., P.R. Martin, and J.C. Wingfield, Urban birds have broader environmental tolerance,
Biology Letters
3: 670-673, 2007.
86. Turner, W.R., Interactions among spatial scales constrain species distributions in fragmented
urban landscapes,
Ecology and Society
11: 6, 2006.
87. Goode, M., Personal communication, 2009.
88. Jones, T.R., Personal communication, 2008.
89. Atwood, T.C., H.P. Weeks, and T.M. Gehring, Spatial ecology of Coyotes along a suburban-
to-rural gradient,
Journal of Wildlife Management
68: 1000-1009, 2004.
90. Noss, R., E. Fleishman, D.A. Dellasala, J.M. Fitzgerald, M.R. Gross, M.B. Main, F. Nagle,
S.L. O'Malley, and J. Rosales, Priorities for improving the scientific foundation of conservation
policy in North America,
Conservation Biology
23: 825-833, 2009.
91. Redford, K.H. and W.M. Adams, Payment for ecosystem services and the challenge of saving
nature,
Conservation Biology
23: 785-787, 2009.
92. Harllee, B., M. Kim, and M. Nieswiadomy, Political influence on historical ESA listings by state:
A count data analysis,
Public Choice
140: 21-42, 2009.
93. Manring, N.J., The politics of accountability in national forest planning,
Administration and
Society
37: 57-88, 2005.
94. Sayre, N.F., Bad abstractions: Response to Sullivan, Conserv
ation Biology
23: 1050-1051, 2009.
95. Beier, P. and R.F. Noss, Do habitat corridors provide connectivity?
Conservation Biology
12:
1241-1252, 1998.
96. Langpap, C. and J. Wu, Predicting the effect of land-use policies on wildlife habitat abundance,
Canadian Journal of Agricultural Economics
56: 195-217, 2008.
97. Hostetler, M. and D. Drake, Conservation subdivisions: A wildlife perspective,
Landscape and
Urban Planning
90: 95-101, 2009.
98. Lovich, J.E. and D. Bainbridge, Anthropogenic degradation of the southern California desert
ecosystem and prospects for natural recovery and restoration,
Environmental Management
24:
309-326, 1999.
99. Markovchick-Nicholls, L., H.M. Regan, D.H. Deutschman, A. Widyanata, B. Martin, L. Noreke,
and T.A. Hunt, Relationships between human disturbance and wildlife land use in urban
habitat fragments,
Conservation Biology
22: 99-109, 2007.
100. Stohlgren, T.J., L.D. Schell, and F.V. Heuvel, How grazing and soil quality affect native and
exotic plant diversity in Rocky Mountain grasslands,
Ecological Applications
9: 45-64, 1999.
101. White, C., The 21st century ranch,
Conservation Biology
22: 1380-1381, 2008.
102. Brunson, M.W. and L. Huntsinger, Ranching as a conservation strategy: Can old ranchers save
the new west?
Rangeland Ecology & Management
61: 137-147, 2008.
103. List, R., G. Ceballos, C. Curtin, P.J.P. Gogan, J. Pacheco, and J. Truett, Historic distribution
and challenges to bison recovery in the northern Chihuahuan desert,
Conservation Biology
21:
1487-1494, 2007.
104. Raven, P.H. and J.A. McNeely, Biological extinction: Its scope and meaning for us, in L.D.
Guruswamy and J.A. McNeely, eds.,
Protection of Global Biodiversity: Converging Strategies
(Durham, NC: Duke University Press, 1998, pp. 13-32).
105. Tilman, D., R.M. May, C.L. Lehman, and M.A. Nowak, Habitat destruction and the extinction
debt,
Nature
371: 65-66, 1994.
106. Hanski, I., Habitat destruction and metapopulation dynamics, in S.T.A. Pickett, R.S. Ostfeld,
M. Shackak, and G.E. Likens, eds.,
The Ecological Basis of Conservation
(New York: Chapman &
Hall, 1997, pp. 217-227).
107. Hanski, I.A., A. Moilanen, and M. Gyllenberg, Minimum viable metapopulation size,
American
Naturalist
147: 527-541, 1996.
Search WWH ::
Custom Search