Chemistry Reference
In-Depth Information
Quantitative analysis of the absorption intensity affords values of the forma-
tion constants ( K DA ) and extinction coefficients (
ε CT )listedinTable1for
comparison with the corresponding characteristics of the bromide complexes
with tetrabromomethane.
2.4
Unified Mulliken Correlations of Donor/Acceptor Complexes
with Halogen Derivatives
According to Mulliken [29-31], the donor/acceptor associates such as those in
Eqs 1 and 2, are described via the ground-state (
Ψ GS )andexcited-state( E ES )
wave functions expressed as the combination of the principal non-bonded
van der Waals (
ψ D,A )anddative(
ψ D + A - )states:
Ψ GS =a
ψ D,A +b
ψ D + A -
(3a)
Ψ ES =b
ψ D,A -a
ψ D + A - ,
(3b)
and the energies of ground and excited states E GS and E ES are:
E D + A - - E D,A 2 +4 H DA 1 / 2
E GS, ES = E D,A + E D + A - /
2
±
/
2,
(4)
where E D,A =
ψ D + A - represent the en-
ergies of the van der Waals and dative states, respectively, and H DA =
ψ
ψ D,A H
ψ D,A and E D + A - =
ψ D + A - H
D + A - represents the electronic coupling matrix element. The optical
(charge-transfer) transition is related to electron promotion from the ground
to the excited state:
D,A H
ψ
ν CT = E ES - E GS = E D + A - - E D,A 2 +4 H DA 1 / 2
h
.
(5)
In a series of structurally related donors with the same acceptor, or the same
donor with various acceptors, the electronic coupling element ( H DA )asde-
termined mostly by orbital overlap, are usually rather invariant. As such, the
changes of the absorption energy in such a series are determined mainly by
differences in the energy gap ( E D + A - - E D,A ) related to the donor/acceptor
properties (i.e., HOMO/LUMO energies). In solution, these properties are
quantitatively evaluated as the oxidation and reduction potentials, E ox and
E red , respectively, to represent the conversion energy of the donor to its
cation-radical, and the acceptor to its anion-radical. The gas-phase mea-
sures of the ionization potential (IP) and electron affinities (EA) represent
alternative and closely related measures of donor and acceptor strengths, re-
spectively [63, 64]. Equation 5 thus predicts an essentially linear relationship
between the absorption energy for the series of associates involving the same
acceptor on the oxidation (or ionization) potential of the donors. Likewise, in
Search WWH ::




Custom Search