Biomedical Engineering Reference
In-Depth Information
11. Breen DE, Whitaker RT. 2001. A level-set approach for the metamorphosis of solid models.
IEEE Trans Visualiz Comput Graphics
7
:173-192.
12. Mansouri AR, Konrad J. 1999. Motion segmentation with level sets.
IEEE Trans Image Process
12
(2):201-220.
13. Paragios N, Deriche R. 2000. Geodesic active contours and level sets for the detection and
tracking of moving objects.
IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Machine Intell
22
(3):266-280.
14. Kornprobst P, Deriche R, Aubert G. 1999. Image sequence analysis via partial differential
equations.
J Math Imaging Vision
11
:5-26.
15. Faugeras O, Keriven R. 1998. Variational principles, surface evolution, PDEs, level set methods
and the stereo problem.
IEEE Trans Image Process
7
:336-344.
16. Kimmel R. 1995. Tracking level sets by level sets: a method for solving the shape from shading
problem.
Comput Vision Image Understand
62
:47-58.
17. Kimmel R, BrucksteinAM. 1995. Global shape fromshading.
Comput Vision Image Understand
62
:360-369.
18. Sapiro G, Kimmel R, Shaked D, Kimia BB, Bruckstein AM. 1997. Implementing continuous-
scale morphology via curve evolution.
Pattern Recognit
26
:1363-1372.
19. Sochen N, Kimmel R, Malladi R. 1998. A geometrical framework for low level vision.
IEEE
Trans Image Process
7
:310-318.
20. Sapiro G, 1997. Color snakes.
Comput Vision Image Understand
68
:247-253.
21. Caselles V, Kimmel R, SapiroG, Sbert C. 1996. Three dimensional object modeling viaminimal
surfaces. In
Proceedings of the European conference on computer vision (ECCV)
, pp. 97-106.
New York: Springer.
22. Kimmel R, Amir A, Bruckstein AM. 1995. Finding shortest paths on surfaces using level sets
propagation.
IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Machine Intell
17
:635-640.
23. DeCarlo D, Gallier J. 1996. Topological evolution of surfaces. In
Proceedings of the graphics
interface 1996 conference
, pp. 194-203. Ed WA Davis, RM Bartels. Mississauga, Ontario:
Canadian Human-Computer Communications Society.
24. Telea A. 2004. An image inpainting technique based on the fast marching method.
Graphics
Tools
9
:23-24.
25. Suri JS. 2001. Two dimensional fast mr brain segmentation using a region-based level set
approach.
Int J Eng Med Biol
20
(4):84-95.
26. Malladi R, Sethian JA. 1998. A real-time algorithm for medical shape recovery. In
Proceedings
of the international conference on computer vision (ICCV'98)
, pp. 304-310. Washington, DC:
IEEE Computer Society.
27. Hermosillo G, Faugeras O, Gomes J. 1999. Unfolding the cerebral cortex using level set meth-
ods. In
Proceedings of the second international conference on scale-space theories in computer
vision
.
Lecture notes in computer science
, Vol. 1682, pp. 58-69. New York: Springer.
28. Sarti A, Ortiz C, Lockett S, Malladi R. 1996. A unified geometric model for 3d confocal image
analysis in cytology. In
Proceedings of the international symposium on computer graphics,
image processing, and vision (SIBGRAPI'98)
, pp. 69-76. Washington, DC: IEEE Computer
Society.
29. Niessen WJ, ter Haar Romeny BM, Viergever MA. 1998. Geodesic deformable models for
medical image analysis.
IEEE Trans Med Imaging
17
:634-641.
30. Gomes J, Faugeras O. 2000. Level sets and distance functions. In
Proceedings of the European
conference on computer vision (ECCV)
, pp. 588-602. New York: Springer.
31. Suri JS. 2000. Leaking prevention in fast level sets using fuzzy models: an application in MR
brain. In
Proceedings of the International Conference on information technology applications
in biomedicine
, pp. 220-226. Washington, DC: IEEE Computer Society.
32. Zeng X, Staib LH, Schultz RT, Duncan JS. 1999. Segmentation and measurement of the cortex
from 3d mr images using coupledsurfaces propagation.
IEEE Trans Med Imaging
18
:927-937.
