Biomedical Engineering Reference
In-Depth Information
For the right-hand side of (10) using the divergence theorem we get
g 0
dx
u n
g 0
∂u n
∂ν
p ∇·
=
ds
|∇
u n− 1 |
|∇
u n− 1 |
∂p
=
q∈C p
g 0
∂u n
∂ν
ds.
|∇
u n− 1 |
e pq
So we have an integral formulation of (8):
dx =
q∈C p
u n
u n− 1
τ
g 0
∂u n
∂ν
1
ds,
(11)
u n− 1 |
u n− 1 |
|∇
|∇
p
e pq
expressing a “local mass balance” in the scheme. Now the exact “fluxes” e pq
g 0
|∇u n 1 |
∂u n
∂ν ds on the right-hand side and the “capacity function”
1
|∇u n 1 |
on the
left-hand side (see, e.g., [59]) will be approximated numerically using piecewise
linear reconstruction of u n− 1 on the tetrahedral grid
T h . If we denote by g T
the
approximation of g 0 on a tetrahedron T
∈T h , then for the approximation of the
right-hand side of (11) we get
T ∈E pq
u q
u p
h pq
g T
c pq
,
(12)
u n− 1
T
|∇
|
q∈C p
and the left-hand side of (11) is approximated by
u p
u n− 1
p
M p m ( p )
,
(13)
τ
where m ( p ) is a measure in IR d of co-volume p and M p is an approximation of the
capacity function inside the finite volume p . For that goal we use the averaging of
the gradients in tetraherda crossing co-volume p , i.e.,
| =
T ∈N p
1
m ( T
p )
u n− 1
p
u n− 1
T
M p =
,
|∇
|∇
|
.
(14)
u n− 1
m ( p )
|∇
|
p
Then the regularization of the capacity function is given by
1
|∇ u n− 1
M p
=
,
(15)
| ε
p
and if we define coefficients (where the ε -regularization is taken into account),
d n− 1
p
= M p m ( p ) ,
(16)
g T
h pq
a n− 1
pq
c pq
=
,
(17)
u n− 1
T
|∇
| ε
T ∈E pq
Search WWH ::




Custom Search