Biomedical Engineering Reference
In-Depth Information
7. Grenander U, Chow Y, Keenan D. 1991.
A pattern theoretic study of biological shapes
.New
York: Springer-Verlag.
8. Miller M, Christensen G, Amit Y, Grenander U. 1993. Mathematical textbook of deformable
neuroanatomies.
Proc Natl Acad Sci USA
24
:11944-11948.
9. Malladi R, Sethian J, Vemuri B. 1995. Shape modeling with front propagation: a level set ap-
proach.
IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Machine Intell
17
:158-175.
10. Caselles V, Kimmel R, Sapiro G. 1997. Geodesic active contours.
Int J Comput Vision
22
:61-79.
11. Kichenassamy S, Kumar A, Olver PJ, Tannenbaum A, Yezzi AJ. 1995. Gradient flows and geo-
metric active contour models. In
Proceedings of the fifth international conference on computer
vision (ICCV'95)
, pp. 810-815. Washington, DC: IEEE Computer Society.
12. Terzopoulos D, Metaxas D. 1991. Dynamic 3D models with local and global deformations:
deformable superquadrics.
IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Machine Intell
13
(7):703-714.
13. Staib L, Duncan J. 1992. Boundary finding with parametrically deformable models.
IEEE Trans
Pattern Anal Machine Intell
14
(11):1061-1075.
14. Terzopoulos D, Platt J, Barr A, Fleischer K. 1987. Elastically deformable models.
Comput Graph-
ics
21
(4):205-214.
15. Cohen LD. 1991. On active contour models and balloons.
Comput VisionGraphics Image Process:
Image Understand
53
(2):211-218.
16. Caselles V, Catte F, Coll T, Dibos F. 1993. A geometric model for active contours in image
processing.
Num Math
66
(1):1-31.
17. Xu C, Prince JL. 1998. Snakes, shapes, and gradient vector flow.
IEEE Trans Image Process
7
(3):359-369.
18. Osher S, Sethian J. 1988. Fronts propagating with curvature-dependent speed: algorithms based
on Hamilton-Jacobi formulations.
J Comput Phys
79
(1):12-49.
19. Osher S, Fedkiw R. 2001. Level set methods: an overview and some recent results.
J Comput
Phys
169
:463-502.
20. Sethian J. 1996.
Level set methods
. Cambridge: Cambridge UP.
21. Lauziere Y, Siddiqi K, Tannenbaum A, Zucker S. 1998. Area and length minimizing flows for
segmentation.
IEEE Trans Image Process
7
:433-444.
22. Tek H, Kimia BB. 1995. Image segmentation by reaction-diffusion bubbles. In
Proceedings of
the fifth international conference on computer vision (ICCV'95)
, pp. 156-162. Washington, DC:
IEEE Computer Society.
23. Yezzi A, Kichenassamy S, Kumar A, Olver P, Tannenbaum A. 1997. A geometric snake model
for segmentation of medical imagery.
IEEE Trans Med Imaging
16
(2):199-209.
24. Tsai A, Yezzi AJ, Willsky AS. 2000. A curve evolution approach to smoothing and segmentation
using the Mumford-Shah functional. In
Proceedings of the international conference on computer
vision and pattern recognition (CVPR'2000)
, pp. 1119-1124. Washington, DC: IEEE Computer
Society.
25. Geman D, Geman S, Gragne C, Dong P. 1990. Boundary detection by constrained optimization.
IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Machine Intell
12
(7):609-628.
26. Hewer GA, Kenney C, Manjunathg BS. 1998. Variational image segmentation using boundary
functions.
IEEE Trans Image Process
7
(9):1269-1282.
27. Caselles V, Kimmel R, Sapiro G. 1995. Geodesic active contours. In
Proceedings of the fifth
international conference on computer vision (ICCV'95)
, pp. 694-699. Washington, DC: IEEE
Computer Society.
28. Paragios N, Deriche R. 2000. Geodesic active contours and level sets for the detection and tracking
of moving objects.
IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Machine Intell
22
:266-280.
29. LeventonM, Grimson E, Faugeras O. 2000. Statistical shape influence in geodesic active contours.
In
Proceedings of the international conference on computer vision and pattern recognition
, Vol.
1, pp. 316-322. Washington, DC: IEEE Computer Society.
30. Chen Y, Thiruvenkadam H, Tagare H, Wilson D. 2002. Using prior shapes in geometric active
contours in variational framework.
Int J Comput Vision
50
:313-328.
