Civil Engineering Reference
In-Depth Information
and O u , in which case the effect of the triple correlation
arising from the modulation is relatively insignificant.
These arguments are valid in the inner sublayer. Indeed, the
effect of the large- and very large-scale structures in the
outer layer may be significant, as we will see in the next
section.
These trains of thought certainly need to be compared
against the simultaneous measurements of u and v , which
are painstaking and difficult at large Reynolds numbers.
DNS at large Re
τ
can also be a great help, but at present
they are still costly to perform. A simple argument in the
same vein as the discussion given in the previous section is
based on the behavior of the Reynolds shear stress via Re τ
.
We have briefly discussed this behavior in Chapter 1,
pointing out that the maximum of uv +
in the inner layer is
expressed by
⎛ ⎞
uv
2
1
,
for
Re
⎜ ⎟
⎝ ⎠
τ
2
u
κ
Re
τ
τ
max
The sensitivity of the distribution of the Reynolds shear
stress to the Reynolds number is significantly less than the
streamwise turbulent intensity, the maximum of which is
affected
considerably
more
by
by
way
of
Re
τ
(
)
(
)
2
. The role played by the correlations
uu u
ln
Re
τ
τ
max
++ + , which come into play in equation
[6.8], therefore, is probably negligible in relation to the
similar terms in relation [6.7], if only in the inner layer.
++
and
*
α
O uv
β
uvu
OM
6.8. Dynamic role of very large-scale motions
The characteristic length scale of the structures, which
contribute to the fluctuations in wall-normal velocity, is
Search WWH ::




Custom Search