Civil Engineering Reference
In-Depth Information
In the opposite case, however, the thickness of the vorticity
layer will increase until it reaches
δ
+
under the influence of
diffusion. The asymptotic thickness is reached after a time
t
+
a
1/ 2
⎡
±
1
⎤
⎛
+
2
⎞
2
δ
1
+
⎢
+
⎥
t
≈
iA
γ
−
1
⎜
⎟
B
π
γ
+
⎢
⎥
⎝
⎠
⎣
⎦
B
For sufficiently long times, the local vorticity disappears
exponentially over time in the direction of the term
(
)
. On the other hand, the negative
ω
+
∝−
exp
γ
B
t
+
+
yA
+
vorticity layer
is far away from the stagnation flow
created by
B
, and it is therefore affected only by the viscosity
(Figure 5.44). The maximum vorticity in this layer decreases
as
ω
−
yA
. From this, we can conclude that for
ω
−
∝
1
t
+
yA
+
+
t
>>
2
γ
, the positive vorticity layer
disappears more
ω
+
B
yA
rapidly than
. A zone of concentrated asymmetry
ω
−
yA
results, thus causing the
regeneration of a new shear layer
Δ
( , , ,)
x
yzt
=
∂ω
∂
x
'
−
∂ω
∂
x
'
y
+
y
−
.
ω∂
∝−
wx
∂
y
Tardu and colleagues [TAR 07a, TAR 08a] opted for a
bypass transition study, which makes analysis easier to
perform, and conducted numerical experiments using DNS
which clearly demonstrated the validity of the analysis
detailed above. Two structures,
A
and
B
, were inserted into
a Poiseuille flow. These structures are individually stable,
but the assigned spanwise asymmetry and their specific
interaction causes a rapid rise in energy and the formation of
a thin wall of shear, which is rapidly ejected away from the
wall toward the outer layer. The process eventually causes a
turbulent spot and then triggers a rapid transition to a fully
developed turbulent flow. This mechanism, which is
somewhat deterministic, has also been successfully applied
Search WWH ::
Custom Search