Civil Engineering Reference
In-Depth Information
twice the total wall enstrophy. By combining this with
equation [3.37] and averaging, we find
(
)
[3.47]
ν ωω ε
2
+=
2
*
x
0
z
0
K
0
where is the dissipation of kinetic energy at the wall. The
readers can verify that relation [3.47] is nothing but the local
kinetic energy transport equation at
*
ε K 0
. This relation was
=
0
y
already obtained in the previous chapter.
Figure 3.23 shows the results found by Blackburn et al.
[BLA 96], obtained using DNS in a turbulent channel flow at
. We can see that in the viscous
sublayer. This equilibrium is broken in the buffer sublayer
and progressively disappears toward the outer layer.
Re τ =
395
A ij A ji
S ij S ji
Figure 3.23. Behavior of the invariants A and S in a) viscous sublayer,
b) buffer sublayer and c) logarithmic sublayer according to [BLA 96]. The
values are rendered dimensionless in relation to the outer scales
Search WWH ::




Custom Search