Results - Response of Flood Events to Land Use and Climate Change - page 176

Fig. 6.44 Scenario (2); estimated velocity (m/s) and depth of water (m), flood 2008; (modeling
without considering the dyke)

Cross2008withdyke Plan: Plan 09 11/9/2010
7

Cross2008withdyke Plan: Plan 09 11/9/2010
7

.1125 .035 .1125

.1125 .035 .1125

Dyke Dyke

Dyke failure Dyke failure

1136.5

Legend

Legend

1136.0

1136

1135.5

EG PF 18
WS PF 18
Ground
Levee
Bank Sta

EG PF 18
WS PF 18
Ground
Bank Sta

1135 1135.0

1134.5

1134 1134.0

1133.5

Inundation

1133 1133.0

1132.5

1132 1132.0

0 50 100 150 200 250 300 0 50 100 150 200 250 300

Station (m) Station (m)

Fig. 6.45 Comparison of flood simulations; left before dyke break; right after dyke break

show how much adding man-made features to DEM, such as dykes, does effect the
flood model simulation and how much the accuracy of the modeling procedure
increases (Fig. 6.48 ).