Environmental Engineering Reference
In-Depth Information
metrological performance of the entire measurement procedure, the type A evalua-
tion of the uncertainty (
u
A
) was conducted for each Cole-Cole parameter, according
to the following expression [16]:
1
n
n
i
=
1
(
x
i
−
x
)
2
u
A
=
(4.6)
(
−
)
n
1
where
n
is the number of measurements,
x
i
is the result of each evaluated parameter,
and
x
is the average of the
n
repetitions. In the measurements reported herein, the
number of repetitions
n
is 10.
Ta b l e 4 . 8
Comparison between the reference and the evaluated Cole-Cole parameters (at
20.0
◦
C) for ethyl acetate. The experimental uncertainties for the evaluated values are also
reported
ethyl acetate
parameter
reference
averaged
experimental
value
evaluated
uncertainty
[3, 11]
value
ε
s
6
.
04
±
0
.
02
6.00
0.01
ε
∞
2
.
48
±
0
.
09
2.71
0.10
f
r
(GHz)
36
.
2
±
0
.
8
29.6
1.0
β
0
.
06
±
0
.
01
0.00
0.00
Ta b l e 4 . 9
Comparison between the reference and the evaluated Cole-Cole parameters (at
20.0
◦
C) for 1,1,1-trichloroethane. The experimental uncertainties for the evaluated values are
also reported
1,1,1-
trichloroethane
parameter
reference
averaged
experimental
value
evaluated
uncertainty
[3, 11]
value
ε
s
7
.
20
±
0
.
10
7.25
0.02
ε
∞
2
.
08
±
0
.
02
2.12
0.15
f
r
(GHz)
28
.
9
±
0
.
6
26.7
0.9
β
0
.
030
±
0
.
002
0.00
0.00
s
)
closely agree with those reported in the literature; additionally, the corresponding
experimental uncertainty (
u
A
) is remarkably low. Similarly, the values obtained for
ε
∞
From Table 4.8 and Table 4.9 the calculated values of the static permittivity (
ε
and for
f
r
are in good agreement with the literature values (which were obtained
Search WWH ::
Custom Search