Information Technology Reference
In-Depth Information
[ 4] = f(0.88757) = 1.33786
[ 5] = f(0.830343) = 1.67699
[ 6] = f(-0.264408) = 1.23778
[ 7] = f(3.65626) = --
[ 8] = f(-0.0847609) = 1.03905
[ 9] = f(-1.09741) = --
[10] = f(-1.91031) = --
[11] = f(3.63916) = --
[12] = f(-1.15611) = --
[13] = f(-0.166747) = 0.855804
[14] = f(-0.066681) = 1.05773
[15] = f(-2.59208) = --
[16] = f(1.45873) = 2.40425
[17] = f(2.0406) = --
[18] = f(-0.152923) = 0.847722
[19] = f(2.20076) = --
The expression of the best individual of this generation (chromosome 16)
is shown in Figure 8.6. It encodes the parameter value
x
0
= 1.45873, which
corresponds to the output
f
(
x
0
) = 2.40425, thus considerably closer to the
global maximum than the best of the previous generation. Note again that this
individual is not related to the best of the previous generations, as neither the
a.
01234567890123456
*-?????????331130
C = {1.79117, -0.287872, -0.400848, -1.36026, 0.1427}
b.
ET
-1.36026
-1.36026
-0.287872
f
Figure 8.6.
Best individual of generation 2 (chromosome 16) created to find the
global maximum of function (8.4).
a)
The chromosome of the individual with its
random numerical constants.
b)
The fully expressed individual.
c)
The parameter
value encoded in the chromosome and corresponding function value.
(1.45873)
(2.40425)
c.
