Information Technology Reference
In-Depth Information
?0-[11]-{1.49783, -0.401642, 1.46631, -0.348816, 0.041168}
?3-[12]-{0.19223, 1.3107, -0.145813, -0.022888, 0.255859}
?2-[13]-{-0.958619, -0.341308, 1.5303, 0.38797, -0.022888}
?2-[14]-{-0.839569, 1.44742, 1.98966, 0.346924, 0.033294}
?2-[15]-{0.697174, 0.556641, 0.626953, 1.29065, -0.686157}
?2-[16]-{1.3107, 0.19223, 0.568451, 0.635193, 0.96988}
?3-[17]-{1.29065, 1.3107, -0.145813, -0.022888, 0.027526}
?2-[18]-{-0.589783, -0.853363, 0.037323, 0.818024, 1.93112}
?0-[19]-{1.52893, -0.401642, 0.05075, 1.51398, 0.160522}
Outputs:
[ 0] = f(1.46631) = 2.27802
[ 1] = f(1.67365) = 2.23274
[ 2] = f(1.44742) = 2.44266
[ 3] = f(-0.434051) = 1.3807
[ 4] = f(-0.411377) = 1.14392
[ 5] = f(1.46631) = 2.27802
[ 6] = f(-0.75528) = 0.255087
[ 7] = f(0.748627) = 0.252069
[ 8] = f(-0.686157) = 1.28909
[ 9] = f(1.67365) = 2.23274
[10] = f(0.626953) = 1.46967
[11] = f(1.49783) = 1.10189
[12] = f(-0.022888) = 1.01508
[13] = f(1.5303) = -0.246576
[14] = f(1.98966) = 0.36469
[15] = f(0.626953) = 1.46967
[16] = f(0.568451) = 0.524405
[17] = f(-0.022888) = 1.01508
[18] = f(0.037323) = 1.0344
[19] = f(1.52893) = -0.206058
The parameter value
x
0
= 1.44742 encoded by the best individual of this
generation (chromosome 2) results in a considerably higher output for func-
tion (8.4), giving
f
(
x
0
) = 2.44266.
And finally, by generation 8, a perfect solution encoding a parameter value
that maps into the global maximum was found:
GENERATION N: 8
Structures:
?2-[ 0]-{0.697174, -0.611939, 1.44742, 1.29065, 0.037323}
?0-[ 1]-{1.79529, 0.431702, 0.121093, 1.2038, 1.94092}
?2-[ 2]-{1.07755, -0.611939, 1.44742, -0.301575, 0.037323}
?0-[ 3]-{1.67365, 0.431702, 0.90503, 1.8645, -0.579163}
?2-[ 4]-{0.697174, -0.611939, 1.44742, 1.90302, -0.654175}
?2-[ 5]-{-0.253937, -0.401642, 1.46631, -0.348816, 0.763977}
