Environmental Engineering Reference
In-Depth Information
1.5
Gain: 1.12
Pole: 0.504 + 0.341i
Damping: 0.641
Overshoot (%): 7.23
1
0.5
π
/T
0.6
π
/T
0.4
π
/T
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
0.6
0.7
0.8
0.9
0.7
π
/T
0.3
π
/T
0.5
0.8
π
/T
0.2
π
/T
0.9
π
/T
0.1
π
/T
π
/T
0
π
/T
0.9
π
/T
0.1
π
/T
−0.5
0.8
π
/T
0.2
π
/T
0.7
π
/T
0.3
π
/T
0.6
π
/T
0.4
π
/T
0.5
π
/T
−1
−1.5
−2
−1.5
−1
−0.5
0
0.5
1
1.5
2
Real Axis
Figure 16.3
Root locus for the controller design
ξ =
.
641. Figure 16.4 shows the Bode plots of the open-loop system for different integral
gain K i with K p =
0
.
12, from which the integral gain is chosen as K i =
200. Since the
controller has a very high gain at the resonant frequency, it has a very good ability to reduce
the steady-state error. The resulting controller in the discrete-time domain is
1
12 z 2
1
.
2
.
196 z
+
1
.
08
C PR ( z )
=
.
(16.10)
z 2
1
.
996 z
+
1
16.4 Experimental Results
The PR controllers implemented in both the
frame and the abc frame were evaluated with
the test rig described in Chapter 15 in the grid-connected mode under five different scenarios
to test the steady-state responses without a local load and with a resistive, non-linear and
unbalanced resistive local load connected to the system, and the transient response without a
local load.
αβ
16.4.1 Steady-state Performance
16.4.1.1 Without a Local Load
In the steady state, the grid current reference I d
was set at 3 A. The reactive power was set at 0
Va r ( I q
0). This corresponds to the unity power factor. All the active power was transferred
to the grid via the step-up transformer. The grid current output i a and its spectra, the current
reference i ref and the tracking error e i are shown in the left column of Figure 16.5 for the
=
 
Search WWH ::




Custom Search