Biomedical Engineering Reference
In-Depth Information
Figure5.7
Illustrativelong-termmonitoringscheme
However, it is worth noting that for some sites it may be necessary to continue
monitoring into the future. Under these circumstances, a comprehensive envi-
ronmental management and audit scheme can be put in place to monitor envi-
ronmental effects of such operations and Figure 5.7 shows a suitable illustrative
outline. The results would then, of course, feed back into the decision-making
process and ultimately help to shape the ongoing environmental management
regime of the site.
Ex situ
techniques
Again, there are three principal approaches in common use, namely land farming,
soil banking and soil slurry bioreactors. Though inevitably there are distinct
similarities between all applications of bioremediation, for obvious reasons of
fundamental biology, these techniques are generally more distinct and separate.
The major benefits of
ex situ
methods are the greater ease of process optimi-
sation and control, relatively shorter treatment time and the increased potential
for the safe introduction of specialised organisms, if and as required. However,
the increased transport costs, additional land requirement and higher levels of
engineering often combine to make these technologies more costly options.
Land farming
This technique is effectively accelerated natural attenuation, taking place offsite,
within constructed earthwork banking to provide what is essentially a low-tech
bioreactor. The pretreatment stage involves the soil being excavated from site,
screened for rocks, rubble and any other oversize inclusions before typically being
stored prior to the commencement of actual remediation, either at the original
location or on arrival at the treatment site.
The processing itself takes place in lined earthworks isolated from the sur-
roundings by an impermeable clay or high density polyethylene (HDPE) liner,
as shown diagrammatically in Figure 5.8, and typically relies on the activities
Search WWH ::
Custom Search