Planning Multifunctional Measures for Efficient Landscape Management: Quantifying and Comparing the Added Value of Integrated and Segregated Management Concepts - Landscape Ecology for Sustainable Environment and Culture - page 269

Fig. 13.7 Implementation costs for integrative measures within different focus areas of specific
multifunctionaity to fulfill 1 % of the objectives (sum of sectoral objectives)
as well as restoration of fens and bogs for climate change mitigation are higher
than costs for water quality conservation or erosion prevention (Table 13.2 ). In
sum, costs for 100 % fulfillment of regional objectives for safeguarding biodi-
versity in scenario 1 are about 14 times higher than for reaching the objectives of
water quality conservation (Table 13.3 ). Nevertheless the financial resources are
used more efficiently, when measures are allocated in areas where multifunctional
benefits can be maximized. The efficiency of measures for safeguarding biodi-
versity is considerably lower in areas where monofunctional restoration is needed
because no multifunctional effects or added value for other functions can be
generated.
Regional Objective Fulfillment with Limited Funds
With a limited budget of 40 Mio. € for 10 years, the regional environmental
quality objectives can be fulfilled to 42.1% (sum of sectoral objective fulfillment)
when measures are allocated proportionally in all areas of action regardless of their
level of multifunctionality. The sum of all sectoral objectives that can be fulfilled
spending 40 Mio. € can reach 52.8 %, when measures are allocated in areas where