Planning Multifunctional Measures for Efficient Landscape Management: Quantifying and Comparing the Added Value of Integrated and Segregated Management Concepts - Landscape Ecology for Sustainable Environment and Culture - page 263

Table 13.4 Multifunctional effects of the integrative scenario (erosion prevention (E), water quality preservation (W), climate change mitigation (C),
safeguarding biodiversity (B))
Degree
multi-
funct.

Overlaying
needs/focus
areas

Rules/principles for
generating an
integrative
management concept,
examples of allocated
integrative measures

Area for
measures
(ha)

Percentage
of case
study area

Implem.
costs
(10 years)

Percentage
of
(theoret.)
costs for
implem. all
measures

Erosion
prevent. on
erosive
sites,
objective
fulfillment
(%)

W: N-
reduction
in kg/*a,
objective
fulfillment
(%)

C: reduction
of CO 2 -
emissions in
t objective
fulfillment
(%)

B: upgrading
of Habitat
value points,
objective
fulfillment
(%)

EWCB

1 EF X Measures of the

sectoral scenario
are adapted

5,922 8.5 87,263,275 22.0 0 0 0 15,965

(21.5 %)

X Measures of the

sectoral scenario
are adapted

8,905 12.8 4,999,434 1.3 0 254,422 0 2,785

(17.0 %) (3.8 %)

X Measures of the

sectoral scenario
are adapted

493 0.7 798,142 0.2 493 0 0 431

(2.5 %) (0.6 %)

2 EF X X Lead: B (M13, M14) 31 0.0 816,220 0.2 31 0 0 123

(0.2 %) (0.2 %)

X X Lead: B (M13, M14) 9,129 13.1 45,296,858 11.4 0 232,824 0 21,392

(15.5 %) (28.9 %)

X X Lead: C (M10, M11) 7,923 11.3 52,380,440 13.2 0 378,349 2,005,876 8,727

(25.2 %) (18.9 %) (11.8 %)

X X M10 (where allocated),

selection of M1
where alternative
measures recomm.
(M1, M8, M9)

1,071 1.5 767,097 0.2 1,071 21,583 0 0

(5.5 %) (1.4 %)

(continued)