Information Technology Reference
In-Depth Information
Table 5.12
Results of the evaluation of personal qualities of graduates made by academi-
cian facilitators of study groups,
%
“Very
high”
Character traits
“Low”
“Mean”
“High”
public activity
14
66
16
4
discipline and promptitude in obeying
6
16
36
42
diligence
18
30
30
22
consistency and self-control
16
44
22
18
organizing abilities
46
28
18
8
group opinion leader
14
38
42
6
purposefulness
24
42
20
14
Table 5.13
Evaluation of personal qualities of five graduates
No. of the graduate
Qualities
1
2
3
4
5
public activity
4
4
3
3
4
discipline and promptitude in obeying
4
5
4
5
5
diligence
3
2
3
4
4
consistency and self-control
4
3
5
5
2
organizing abilities
2
2
3
5
4
group opinion leader
4
3
4
3
3
purposefulness
4
4
4
5
5
Average marks
3,57
3,27
3,71
4
3,85
While obtaining fuzzy rating points and normalized ratings of personal qualities of
graduates, weight coefficients of all components were considered be equal. Parame-
ters of fuzzy ratings are summarized in Table
5.14.
Table 5.14
Normalized and fuzzy rating points of personal qualities of five graduates
No. of the graduate
Rating
1
2
3
4
5
Normalized
0,585
0,484
0,610
0,754 0,657
Fuzzy
0,574
0,468
0,602
0,732 0,635
0,598
0,488
0,625
0,768 0,687
0,104
0,112
0,109
0,096 0,116
0,136
0,142
0,134
0,094 0,211
